Tools & Wizards About Us
blog.screensteps.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

blog.screensteps.com

The ScreenSteps Learning Center for Call Centers and Employee Support

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

356 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

563 ms

blog.screensteps.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Blog Screen Steps content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about blog.screensteps.com

Learn how to train and support your employees in less time with Zero Memorization. Our Learning Center contains actionable insights that will help you improve your call center and employee operations.

Visit blog.screensteps.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Blog.screensteps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

blog.screensteps.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,770 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

learning-center

356 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

39 ms

Header.min.css

253 ms

module_35005853597_Hero.min.css

75 ms

module_35005898178_Learning_Center.min.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Blog.screensteps.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to 298890.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (428 ms) relates to the external source Screensteps.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 148.2 kB (20%)

Content Size

724.9 kB

After Optimization

576.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Blog.screensteps.com main page is 724.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 439.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 130.1 kB

  • Original 146.3 kB
  • After minification 105.8 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 40.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 74 B

  • Original 439.8 kB
  • After minification 439.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Screen Steps images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 90.2 kB
  • After minification 90.2 kB
  • After compression 83.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 48.6 kB
  • After minification 48.6 kB
  • After compression 36.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.screensteps.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (56%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Screen Steps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

learning-center

learning-center

356 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

jquery-1.7.1.js

39 ms

Header.min.css

Header.min.css

253 ms

module_35005853597_Hero.min.css

module_35005853597_Hero.min.css

75 ms

module_35005898178_Learning_Center.min.css

module_35005898178_Learning_Center.min.css

53 ms

Footer.min.css

Footer.min.css

272 ms

render-script.min.js

render-script.min.js

242 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

63 ms

production.min.css

production.min.css

260 ms

css2

css2

54 ms

all.css

all.css

49 ms

jquery.mobile.min.js

jquery.mobile.min.js

139 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

159 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

60 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

77 ms

embed.js

embed.js

57 ms

production.min.js

production.min.js

428 ms

project.js

project.js

107 ms

v2.js

v2.js

167 ms

project.js

project.js

198 ms

120141.js

120141.js

368 ms

index.js

index.js

365 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

240 ms

16x9.png

16x9.png

194 ms

leaerning-center-subscribe-icon.png

leaerning-center-subscribe-icon.png

253 ms

screensteps-logo.png

screensteps-logo.png

192 ms

screensteps-logo--light.png

screensteps-logo--light.png

255 ms

21972-312_SOC_NonCPA-png.png

21972-312_SOC_NonCPA-png.png

192 ms

Loading%20Animation.gif

Loading%20Animation.gif

198 ms

background-case-study-panel.png

background-case-study-panel.png

197 ms

screensteps--dropdown--toggle.svg

screensteps--dropdown--toggle.svg

198 ms

Email%20Banner%20-%20Financial%20Institution%20-%201200px%20-%20627px.png

Email%20Banner%20-%20Financial%20Institution%20-%201200px%20-%20627px.png

138 ms

Greg-DeVore-150.jpg

Greg-DeVore-150.jpg

197 ms

icon-arrow-right.svg

icon-arrow-right.svg

226 ms

ScreenSteps%20Implementation%20Timeline.svg

ScreenSteps%20Implementation%20Timeline.svg

201 ms

0624-Hero-SupervisorVacation-1.jpg

0624-Hero-SupervisorVacation-1.jpg

265 ms

Jonathan-DeVore-Headshot.jpg

Jonathan-DeVore-Headshot.jpg

289 ms

0624-JuneNewsletter-WhichComesFirst.jpg

0624-JuneNewsletter-WhichComesFirst.jpg

265 ms

0624-hero-AIfind&follow.jpg

0624-hero-AIfind&follow.jpg

262 ms

0524-Hero-KBvsLMS.jpg

0524-Hero-KBvsLMS.jpg

262 ms

Lane-Rebecca.jpg

Lane-Rebecca.jpg

288 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

223 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

251 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

294 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

293 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

136 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

133 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

120 ms

120141.js

120141.js

202 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

176 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

200 ms

fb.js

fb.js

160 ms

120141.js

120141.js

252 ms

Accessibility Review

blog.screensteps.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

blog.screensteps.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

blog.screensteps.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.screensteps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.screensteps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

blog.screensteps.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Screen Steps. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: