Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

classic.studylight.org

Welcome to the Future - StudyLight.org

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

427 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

240 ms

classic.studylight.org screenshot

About Website

Visit classic.studylight.org now to see the best up-to-date Classic Study Light content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about classic.studylight.org

Welcome to a new and improved way to study God's Word.

Visit classic.studylight.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Classic.studylight.org page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classic.studylight.org performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,010 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

classic.studylight.org

427 ms

jquery.min.js

425 ms

scroller.js

139 ms

alt_click.js

156 ms

booklookup.js

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Classic.studylight.org, 11% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Studylight.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (531 ms) belongs to the original domain Classic.studylight.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 508.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

883.4 kB

After Optimization

374.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Classic.studylight.org main page is 883.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 480.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 191.8 kB

  • Original 256.8 kB
  • After minification 253.8 kB
  • After compression 64.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 146.0 kB
  • After minification 144.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classic Study Light images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 315.1 kB

  • Original 480.7 kB
  • After minification 478.7 kB
  • After compression 165.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 315.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (75%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classic Study Light. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

classic.studylight.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

classic.studylight.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

classic.studylight.org SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classic.studylight.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Classic.studylight.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classic Study Light. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: