Tools & Wizards About Us
files.snapfiles.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

files.snapfiles.com

SnapFiles freeware and shareware downloads and reviews, trusted for quality since 1997

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

311 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

136 ms

files.snapfiles.com screenshot

About Website

Visit files.snapfiles.com now to see the best up-to-date Files Snap content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about files.snapfiles.com

Download freeware and shareware programs, fully reviewed and rated by SnapFiles staff, and user reviews. Established in 1997

Visit files.snapfiles.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Files.snapfiles.com page load time and found that the first response time was 311 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

files.snapfiles.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,810 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

files.snapfiles.com

311 ms

reset.css

117 ms

cs3.css

149 ms

snapfiles10-5.css

376 ms

css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Files.snapfiles.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (491 ms) belongs to the original domain Files.snapfiles.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.9 kB (30%)

Content Size

337.8 kB

After Optimization

236.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Files.snapfiles.com main page is 337.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 134.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 62.2 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.4 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 125.7 kB
  • After minification 115.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Files Snap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 134.3 kB
  • After minification 134.3 kB
  • After compression 102.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Files.snapfiles.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (47%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Files Snap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

files.snapfiles.com

files.snapfiles.com

311 ms

reset.css

reset.css

117 ms

cs3.css

cs3.css

149 ms

snapfiles10-5.css

snapfiles10-5.css

376 ms

css

css

38 ms

css

css

54 ms

css

css

56 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

70 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

15 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

26 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

29 ms

sflogo-smaller.png

sflogo-smaller.png

411 ms

searchbg.png

searchbg.png

82 ms

searchbutton.png

searchbutton.png

122 ms

navarrow-down.png

navarrow-down.png

81 ms

navarrow-up.png

navarrow-up.png

83 ms

tixati-hl.png

tixati-hl.png

272 ms

main-nav-arrow.png

main-nav-arrow.png

123 ms

i_notepadplus.gif

i_notepadplus.gif

121 ms

trendup.png

trendup.png

151 ms

i_losslesscut.png

i_losslesscut.png

155 ms

i_7zip.gif

i_7zip.gif

159 ms

i_vivaldi.png

i_vivaldi.png

179 ms

i_renamemaster.gif

i_renamemaster.gif

180 ms

i_smplayer.gif

i_smplayer.gif

269 ms

i_torbrowser.png

i_torbrowser.png

269 ms

i_qdir.gif

i_qdir.gif

270 ms

i_vmplayer.png

i_vmplayer.png

270 ms

i_kindlepc.gif

i_kindlepc.gif

271 ms

alterpdf.png

alterpdf.png

392 ms

40star.png

40star.png

322 ms

userrating5.png

userrating5.png

322 ms

i_whatsapp.png

i_whatsapp.png

321 ms

expand.png

expand.png

320 ms

userrating3.png

userrating3.png

320 ms

t_whatsapp.png

t_whatsapp.png

378 ms

popmeter8.png

popmeter8.png

392 ms

i_wialoader.png

i_wialoader.png

376 ms

noustars.png

noustars.png

393 ms

t_wialoader.png

t_wialoader.png

377 ms

popmeter5.png

popmeter5.png

435 ms

i_editplus.png

i_editplus.png

434 ms

35star.png

35star.png

436 ms

t_editplus.png

t_editplus.png

464 ms

popmeter7.png

popmeter7.png

466 ms

i_poppeeper.gif

i_poppeeper.gif

466 ms

45star.png

45star.png

491 ms

t_poppeeper.gif

t_poppeeper.gif

485 ms

font

font

65 ms

font

font

66 ms

collect

collect

81 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

209 ms

i_autohotkey.gif

i_autohotkey.gif

420 ms

50star.png

50star.png

462 ms

t_autohotkey.gif

t_autohotkey.gif

429 ms

popmeter9.png

popmeter9.png

427 ms

i_rjtexted.png

i_rjtexted.png

433 ms

t_rjtexted.png

t_rjtexted.png

434 ms

js

js

62 ms

userrating4.png

userrating4.png

408 ms

t_vivaldi.png

t_vivaldi.png

462 ms

popmeter10.png

popmeter10.png

462 ms

i_nxfilter.png

i_nxfilter.png

443 ms

t_nxfilter.png

t_nxfilter.png

437 ms

i_atlantis.gif

i_atlantis.gif

346 ms

t_atlantis.png

t_atlantis.png

348 ms

i_Wireshark.gif

i_Wireshark.gif

403 ms

t_wireshark.png

t_wireshark.png

420 ms

popmeter1.png

popmeter1.png

403 ms

i_httptoolkit.png

i_httptoolkit.png

366 ms

i_browserdownloads.png

i_browserdownloads.png

374 ms

Accessibility Review

files.snapfiles.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

files.snapfiles.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

files.snapfiles.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Files.snapfiles.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Files.snapfiles.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

files.snapfiles.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Files Snap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: