5.9 sec in total
225 ms
3.9 sec
1.8 sec
Visit genotopia.scienceblog.com now to see the best up-to-date Genotopia Scienceblog content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about genotopia.scienceblog.com
Here Lies Truth
Visit genotopia.scienceblog.comWe analyzed Genotopia.scienceblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
genotopia.scienceblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
225 ms
31 ms
33 ms
46 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Genotopia.scienceblog.com, 13% (15 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) relates to the external source 3quarksdaily.com.
Page size can be reduced by 670.0 kB (25%)
2.7 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Genotopia.scienceblog.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Genotopia Scienceblog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 431.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 431.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Genotopia.scienceblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 135.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (65%)
105
37
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Genotopia Scienceblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
genotopia.scienceblog.com
225 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
31 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
33 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
46 ms
css
82 ms
style.css
35 ms
style.css
31 ms
style.css
52 ms
twentytwelve.css
61 ms
genericons.css
59 ms
jetpack.css
52 ms
jquery.js
62 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
58 ms
spin.js
60 ms
jquery.spin.js
61 ms
plusone.js
110 ms
widgets.js
188 ms
infinity.js
21 ms
jquery.cycle.js
21 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
24 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
86 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
24 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
23 ms
gprofiles.js
86 ms
wpgroho.js
23 ms
navigation.js
28 ms
wp-embed.min.js
26 ms
postmessage.js
30 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
30 ms
jquery.inview.js
30 ms
queuehandler.js
30 ms
sharing.js
81 ms
e-201609.js
20 ms
pf-print-icon.gif
134 ms
6112686-M.jpg
1187 ms
header_ESSAY-525371733.jpg
996 ms
dna-dollars-200px.gif
116 ms
6a00d8341c562c53ef01a73e1660db970d-800wi
3586 ms
image.0011.jpg
112 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-18-at-10.38.28-AM.png
111 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-18-at-10.40.57-AM.png
110 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-18-at-10.38.53-AM.png
110 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-01-18-at-10.45.59-AM.png
111 ms
loading.gif
109 ms
pf-pdf-icon.gif
203 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
806 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
834 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
129 ms
printfriendly.js
704 ms
Genericons.svg
701 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
7 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBtIh4imgI8P11RFo6YPCPC0.woff
721 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxoUt79146ZFaIJxILcpzmhI.woff
728 ms
master.html
730 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
576 ms
hovercard.css
94 ms
services.css
101 ms
share
89 ms
g.gif
54 ms
graph.facebook.com
211 ms
share
213 ms
graph.facebook.com
224 ms
share
216 ms
graph.facebook.com
224 ms
share
205 ms
graph.facebook.com
221 ms
share
203 ms
graph.facebook.com
220 ms
share
202 ms
graph.facebook.com
218 ms
share
202 ms
graph.facebook.com
216 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
232 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
26 ms
g.gif
26 ms
g.gif
27 ms
g.gif
27 ms
g.gif
34 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
27 ms
g.gif
27 ms
g.gif
27 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
28 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
21 ms
jquery.js
48 ms
postmessage.js
29 ms
jed.js
69 ms
underscore.min.js
70 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
48 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
66 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
30 ms
24 ms
likes-rest.js
28 ms
162 ms
27 ms
batch
170 ms
jot.html
28 ms
noticons.css
29 ms
style.css
27 ms
Noticons.svg
35 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
2 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
30 ms
15ccd7d03eebb14d9480df67ddf690b9
43 ms
525346fbfbffba44ea36bc421b0e187e
134 ms
ee4b3f4244e92d74385997243c7c1f24
158 ms
ec4690e0952a97171b77796ac0841e72
186 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
32 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
27 ms
genotopia.scienceblog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
genotopia.scienceblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
genotopia.scienceblog.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Genotopia.scienceblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Genotopia.scienceblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
genotopia.scienceblog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Genotopia Scienceblog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: