Tools & Wizards About Us
jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

SignRequest

Page Load Speed

901 ms in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

807 ms

Page Rendered

81 ms

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jhtpropertygroup Sign Request content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

Sign yourself or get documents signed. Easy, secure, legally binding and free.

Visit jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 888 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,920 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

13 ms

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

430 ms

css

89 ms

css

107 ms

css

115 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to Js.stripe.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) belongs to the original domain Jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.8 kB (39%)

Content Size

56.1 kB

After Optimization

34.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com main page is 56.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 29.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 27.1 kB
  • After minification 25.9 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 29.0 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jhtpropertygroup Sign Request needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (56%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jhtpropertygroup Sign Request. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

13 ms

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

430 ms

css

css

89 ms

css

css

107 ms

css

css

115 ms

chunk-vendors.9426a7ff.css

chunk-vendors.9426a7ff.css

9 ms

index.f541db87.css

index.f541db87.css

40 ms

68 ms

97 ms

dropins.js

dropins.js

93 ms

script.js

script.js

228 ms

chunk-vendors.5f51eafe.js

chunk-vendors.5f51eafe.js

98 ms

index.43426b71.js

index.43426b71.js

96 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

143 ms

leader2021.png

leader2021.png

104 ms

iso.png

iso.png

34 ms

frame

frame

112 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

41 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

45 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

50 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

51 ms

outer.html

outer.html

7 ms

channel.html

channel.html

7 ms

inner.html

inner.html

15 ms

Accessibility Review

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jhtpropertygroup.signrequest.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jhtpropertygroup Sign Request. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: