Tools & Wizards About Us
payment.spamfighter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

payment.spamfighter.com

PC optimization, PC security and spam filters for clients and servers - FIGHTERtools

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

253 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

payment.spamfighter.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Payment Spam Fighter content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about payment.spamfighter.com

SPAMfighter is a global provider of state-of-the-art computer, mobile and server utility and security products to millions of users from 235 countries.

Visit payment.spamfighter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Payment.spamfighter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

payment.spamfighter.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.spamfighter.com

253 ms

www.spamfighter.com

615 ms

analytics.js

45 ms

gtm.js

80 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

224 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Payment.spamfighter.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) relates to the external source Spamfighter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Payment.spamfighter.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 39.4 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 65.6 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Payment Spam Fighter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 321.3 kB
  • After minification 321.1 kB
  • After compression 304.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 40.1 kB
  • After minification 40.0 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Payment.spamfighter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (35%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

60

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Payment Spam Fighter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.spamfighter.com

www.spamfighter.com

253 ms

www.spamfighter.com

www.spamfighter.com

615 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

45 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

80 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

224 ms

FT.css

FT.css

315 ms

base.css

base.css

337 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

344 ms

layout.css

layout.css

341 ms

template.css

template.css

470 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

344 ms

gallery.css

gallery.css

399 ms

featherlight.css

featherlight.css

420 ms

remindStyles.css

remindStyles.css

428 ms

outdatedbrowser.min.css

outdatedbrowser.min.css

429 ms

css

css

58 ms

all.js

all.js

70 ms

outdatedbrowser.min.js

outdatedbrowser.min.js

428 ms

matchMedia.js

matchMedia.js

533 ms

matchMedia.addListener.js

matchMedia.addListener.js

533 ms

enquire.min.js

enquire.min.js

534 ms

DL_Event.js

DL_Event.js

535 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

533 ms

featherlight.js

featherlight.js

592 ms

remindFunc.js

remindFunc.js

593 ms

js

js

45 ms

sflogo.png

sflogo.png

121 ms

SFMAC_logo.png

SFMAC_logo.png

121 ms

nav-logo_sf.png

nav-logo_sf.png

122 ms

nav-logo_rc2.png

nav-logo_rc2.png

122 ms

nav-logo_fd.png

nav-logo_fd.png

200 ms

nav-logo_dv.png

nav-logo_dv.png

199 ms

nav-logo_vf.png

nav-logo_vf.png

199 ms

nav-logo_sw.png

nav-logo_sw.png

200 ms

spam_mail_box.png

spam_mail_box.png

693 ms

transparent_1x1.png

transparent_1x1.png

200 ms

apple_ios_icon.png

apple_ios_icon.png

284 ms

windows_10_icon.png

windows_10_icon.png

284 ms

exchange_icon.png

exchange_icon.png

283 ms

ms-partner-gold_black.png

ms-partner-gold_black.png

290 ms

intel-software-partner.png

intel-software-partner.png

291 ms

opswat-partner-cert.png

opswat-partner-cert.png

369 ms

msexchange-gold-award.png

msexchange-gold-award.png

369 ms

sf-logo.png

sf-logo.png

367 ms

vf-logo.png

vf-logo.png

369 ms

sw-logo.png

sw-logo.png

370 ms

rc-logo.png

rc-logo.png

451 ms

fd-logo.png

fd-logo.png

452 ms

dv-logo.png

dv-logo.png

454 ms

SPAMfighter_SEM.png

SPAMfighter_SEM.png

453 ms

SPAMfighter_Gateway.png

SPAMfighter_Gateway.png

455 ms

virus_fighter_med.png

virus_fighter_med.png

548 ms

cloud_mail_gateway.png

cloud_mail_gateway.png

619 ms

pcworld.gif

pcworld.gif

547 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

148 ms

like.php

like.php

142 ms

gizmodo.gif

gizmodo.gif

510 ms

cnn.gif

cnn.gif

509 ms

cnet.gif

cnet.gif

579 ms

spiceworks.gif

spiceworks.gif

579 ms

mashable.gif

mashable.gif

580 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

100 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

100 ms

uk.png

uk.png

580 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

66 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

70 ms

flag_dk.png

flag_dk.png

589 ms

flag_de.png

flag_de.png

587 ms

es.png

es.png

588 ms

nor.png

nor.png

590 ms

fr.png

fr.png

588 ms

ie.png

ie.png

638 ms

iFHdqkg-hVK.js

iFHdqkg-hVK.js

31 ms

GzgedhmzSQa.png

GzgedhmzSQa.png

29 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

61 ms

ch-1.png

ch-1.png

593 ms

se.png

se.png

592 ms

nl.png

nl.png

594 ms

at.png

at.png

595 ms

us.png

us.png

591 ms

settings

settings

96 ms

ca.png

ca.png

577 ms

ar.png

ar.png

591 ms

mx.png

mx.png

591 ms

ch.png

ch.png

586 ms

au.png

au.png

587 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

21 ms

th.png

th.png

511 ms

www.spamfighter.com

www.spamfighter.com

851 ms

sniper_white.png

sniper_white.png

590 ms

sf-watermark.jpg

sf-watermark.jpg

592 ms

map-pixeled.png

map-pixeled.png

834 ms

embeds

embeds

37 ms

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

32 ms

social_fb.png

social_fb.png

510 ms

social_twitter.png

social_twitter.png

509 ms

social_youtube.png

social_youtube.png

590 ms

social_linkedin.png

social_linkedin.png

588 ms

Accessibility Review

payment.spamfighter.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

payment.spamfighter.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

payment.spamfighter.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Payment.spamfighter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Payment.spamfighter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

payment.spamfighter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Payment Spam Fighter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: