Tools & Wizards About Us
pillowcovers.sbm.pw screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

pillowcovers.sbm.pw

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2020

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

415 ms

pillowcovers.sbm.pw screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pillowcovers Sbm content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pillowcovers.sbm.pw

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit pillowcovers.sbm.pw

Key Findings

We analyzed Pillowcovers.sbm.pw page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pillowcovers.sbm.pw performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,310 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pillowcovers.sbm.pw

146 ms

www.pillowcovers.sbm.pw

700 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

129 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

122 ms

font-awesome.min.css

124 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Pillowcovers.sbm.pw, 65% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Pillowcovers.sbm.pw.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.5 kB (40%)

Content Size

293.8 kB

After Optimization

177.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pillowcovers.sbm.pw main page is 293.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 136.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 98.8 kB

  • Original 114.8 kB
  • After minification 94.4 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pillowcovers Sbm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 136.6 kB
  • After minification 136.6 kB
  • After compression 129.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pillowcovers.sbm.pw needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (93%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pillowcovers Sbm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pillowcovers.sbm.pw

pillowcovers.sbm.pw

146 ms

www.pillowcovers.sbm.pw

www.pillowcovers.sbm.pw

700 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

129 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

122 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

124 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

127 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

126 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

custom.js

custom.js

184 ms

js

js

48 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

31 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

9 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

12 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

129 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

135 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

134 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

135 ms

ad.js

ad.js

368 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

68 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

129 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

129 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

190 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

60 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

217 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

removed.png

removed.png

98 ms

removed.png

removed.png

98 ms

removed.png

removed.png

104 ms

removed.png

removed.png

104 ms

removed.png

removed.png

105 ms

removed.png

removed.png

91 ms

removed.png

removed.png

91 ms

removed.png

removed.png

89 ms

removed.png

removed.png

94 ms

removed.png

removed.png

92 ms

removed.png

removed.png

87 ms

removed.png

removed.png

89 ms

removed.png

removed.png

90 ms

removed.png

removed.png

89 ms

removed.png

removed.png

81 ms

removed.png

removed.png

84 ms

removed.png

removed.png

78 ms

removed.png

removed.png

78 ms

removed.png

removed.png

72 ms

removed.png

removed.png

69 ms

removed.png

removed.png

71 ms

removed.png

removed.png

71 ms

removed.png

removed.png

58 ms

removed.png

removed.png

59 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

62 ms

removed.png

removed.png

56 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

44 ms

removed.png

removed.png

41 ms

removed.png

removed.png

41 ms

removed.png

removed.png

33 ms

removed.png

removed.png

57 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

38 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

removed.png

removed.png

11 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

removed.png

removed.png

14 ms

removed.png

removed.png

12 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

removed.png

removed.png

12 ms

removed.png

removed.png

11 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

removed.png

removed.png

11 ms

removed.png

removed.png

12 ms

removed.png

removed.png

17 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

Accessibility Review

pillowcovers.sbm.pw accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

pillowcovers.sbm.pw best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pillowcovers.sbm.pw SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pillowcovers.sbm.pw can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pillowcovers.sbm.pw main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pillowcovers.sbm.pw

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pillowcovers Sbm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: