Tools & Wizards About Us
profile.sourcetool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

profile.sourcetool.com

Sourcetool.com -- The B2B Search Engine

Page Load Speed

20.9 sec in total

First Response

112 ms

Resources Loaded

20.6 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

profile.sourcetool.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to profile.sourcetool.com homepage info - get ready to check Profile Sourcetool best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about profile.sourcetool.com

Sourcetool.com -- the source for business to business products and suppliers around the world

Visit profile.sourcetool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Profile.sourcetool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 20.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

profile.sourcetool.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.229

55/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

profile.sourcetool.com

112 ms

pl.css

27 ms

st.css

29 ms

formcheck.js

30 ms

ctasp-server.cgi

20481 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Profile.sourcetool.com, 7% (1 request) were made to Analytics.sourcetool.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Analytics.sourcetool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 22.1 kB (78%)

Content Size

28.4 kB

After Optimization

6.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Profile.sourcetool.com main page is 28.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 16.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 16.1 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profile.sourcetool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (62%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profile Sourcetool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

profile.sourcetool.com

profile.sourcetool.com

112 ms

pl.css

pl.css

27 ms

st.css

st.css

29 ms

formcheck.js

formcheck.js

30 ms

ctasp-server.cgi

ctasp-server.cgi

20481 ms

sb_03.gif

sb_03.gif

29 ms

sb_01.gif

sb_01.gif

25 ms

sb_05.gif

sb_05.gif

26 ms

tn_05.gif

tn_05.gif

26 ms

tn_01.gif

tn_01.gif

27 ms

tn_07.gif

tn_07.gif

31 ms

newlogo.gif

newlogo.gif

53 ms

ft_03.gif

ft_03.gif

56 ms

ft_01.gif

ft_01.gif

61 ms

ft_05.gif

ft_05.gif

56 ms

Accessibility Review

profile.sourcetool.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

profile.sourcetool.com best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

profile.sourcetool.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profile.sourcetool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Profile.sourcetool.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

profile.sourcetool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Profile Sourcetool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: