4.4 sec in total
782 ms
3.6 sec
76 ms
Click here to check amazing Protools Studio MIX Pro content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about protools.studiomixpro.com
Top quality audio mixing templates | Professional pre-engineered mixing templates | Rock template | Metal template | Pop-Rock template | Acoustic template
Visit protools.studiomixpro.comWe analyzed Protools.studiomixpro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 782 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
protools.studiomixpro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
782 ms
35 ms
84 ms
1139 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Protools.studiomixpro.com, 48% (31 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 28% (18 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 512.3 kB (39%)
1.3 MB
797.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Protools.studiomixpro.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 608.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 345.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 345.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 156.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Protools Studio MIX Pro needs image optimization as it can save up to 156.8 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (21%)
47
37
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protools Studio MIX Pro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.protools.studiomixpro.com
782 ms
minified.js
35 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
84 ms
polyfill.min.js
1139 ms
thunderbolt-commons.f641ffe5.bundle.min.js
73 ms
main.fae1c592.bundle.min.js
79 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
76 ms
lodash.min.js
77 ms
react.production.min.js
77 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
78 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
75 ms
84770f_9c23f56a09a7f06d4dbf80ed6fdcd2e4.png
237 ms
982d7c_fbef30f3df2b4df499825ab3efb5835b.png
388 ms
982d7c_43b2a0d208fe4053a1be36beb9526486.png
389 ms
84770f_6bbe4230fd71efea7703ecffee091215.png
274 ms
982d7c_d321c7091d3a46f6b54829b98f9dd90c.jpg
471 ms
78b2cb2b07fe4d0db9359e21aa1b0a98.png
400 ms
982d7c_db3a8546289948128b3e3386e36ae80a.png
492 ms
982d7c_1a3333006b7d4661b7d6144e19074a4b.png
501 ms
982d7c_1bdd0e4e8d1c42c39756378139e0e107.png
586 ms
982d7c_1b05f55025544408b4157a3484d58f0d.png
628 ms
982d7c_cdbf483a782d48ee8e3784b78fa1a33e.png
607 ms
982d7c_82d4b44df5f6436587256a02017e9b69.png
694 ms
982d7c_b98e6c1086ab4d6ca9f51cfb4e5f47b6.png
678 ms
982d7c_4d12d5a069db467abf6eda62d09c60ae.png
772 ms
982d7c_395898dfc25d4520b4d0bdf83456b2be.png
805 ms
982d7c_43e7b9be9eec4729b30d38d896a437e7.png
751 ms
982d7c_5d00b946a1554387b97c97eb3a76c683.png
863 ms
982d7c_9c019892e6b34d2fba1829a1ca61e3c9.png
840 ms
982d7c_ef4578afdff7480d96406b24239024ec.png
835 ms
982d7c_44250933d0ee4935af32228b10997024.png
959 ms
982d7c_1f4e415d11d2418884465fbefc446033.png
929 ms
982d7c_d8e3420a13594669a40239d405960e48.png
989 ms
982d7c_e14a851474d7492bbcec8c9733c388d7~mv2.png
1016 ms
982d7c_8ac3c3d417f14d31a82c0320bbd96b58.png
1100 ms
982d7c_0f766283e38b4edfaa2d0092cdf88a4b.png
1148 ms
982d7c_97f1a98058c449acaea4a71966352ce3.png
1179 ms
982d7c_a8adfc1cf30f49b39d5aad02d666ae18.png
1176 ms
982d7c_4c8a7bad7a3a4b71bbf3639aaf483305.png
1187 ms
982d7c_ea58471fe33147e0a1e3b20b2f614c52.png
1281 ms
982d7c_4a8496d1c1ee4580988d1e5377c34c5f.png
1373 ms
982d7c_d858c6ec8de9e1ef0f22eba5cc3351fc.jpg
1150 ms
sloppyframe.d2412ec4.png
128 ms
bundle.min.js
173 ms
94e45703-fbd7-46e5-9fcd-228ae59d6266.woff
85 ms
9ee00678-b6d7-4b4f-8448-70cfa267d36b.woff
40 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
41 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
41 ms
a9eddc47-990d-47a3-be4e-c8cdec0090c6.woff
12 ms
152 ms
151 ms
168 ms
164 ms
164 ms
163 ms
193 ms
188 ms
222 ms
223 ms
223 ms
219 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
30 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
protools.studiomixpro.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
protools.studiomixpro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
protools.studiomixpro.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protools.studiomixpro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protools.studiomixpro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
protools.studiomixpro.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Protools Studio MIX Pro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: