Tools & Wizards About Us
qa.studyfaq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

qa.studyfaq.com

Homework Answers and Questions - Online Tutors at QA StudyFAQ

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

267 ms

qa.studyfaq.com screenshot

About Website

Visit qa.studyfaq.com now to see the best up-to-date QA StudyFAQ content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qa.studyfaq.com

Find the Best Answers to Your Homework Questions, Assignments & Papers ✅ Get Answers from Premium Tutors 24/7 ✅ Don't Hesitate - Get a Quality Homework Help from the Best Tutors ✅ QA StudyFAQ

Visit qa.studyfaq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qa.studyfaq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qa.studyfaq.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qa.studyfaq.com

248 ms

qa.studyfaq.com

1818 ms

analytics.js

29 ms

css

52 ms

bootstrap.min.css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Qa.studyfaq.com, 15% (10 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Qa.studyfaq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

534.8 kB

After Optimization

446.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qa.studyfaq.com main page is 534.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 259.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 72.8 kB

  • Original 86.9 kB
  • After minification 64.6 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 89.9 kB
  • After minification 86.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. QA StudyFAQ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 259.4 kB
  • After minification 259.4 kB
  • After compression 251.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 98.6 kB
  • After minification 96.6 kB
  • After compression 95.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qa.studyfaq.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (90%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of QA StudyFAQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qa.studyfaq.com

qa.studyfaq.com

248 ms

qa.studyfaq.com

qa.studyfaq.com

1818 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

29 ms

css

css

52 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

16 ms

color-picker.min.css

color-picker.min.css

42 ms

all.css

all.css

45 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

43 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

48 ms

plupload.full.min.js

plupload.full.min.js

137 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

47 ms

editor.min.css

editor.min.css

133 ms

script.js

script.js

132 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

133 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

131 ms

marionette.js

marionette.js

133 ms

appengine.js

appengine.js

134 ms

all-scripts.js

all-scripts.js

133 ms

front.js

front.js

134 ms

pumping.js

pumping.js

321 ms

jquery.plugin.min.js

jquery.plugin.min.js

321 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

321 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

321 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

322 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

322 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

323 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

323 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.js

324 ms

iris.min.js

iris.min.js

323 ms

poll.js

poll.js

324 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

324 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

325 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

325 ms

wp-a11y.min.js

wp-a11y.min.js

325 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

328 ms

scripts-desktop.js

scripts-desktop.js

325 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

326 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

326 ms

color-picker.min.js

color-picker.min.js

327 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

325 ms

ec.js

ec.js

16 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

236 ms

js

js

292 ms

hotjar-1072112.js

hotjar-1072112.js

298 ms

dfda9eb7361d01ed3d757d0bcb93a785

dfda9eb7361d01ed3d757d0bcb93a785

291 ms

0fdb9bbd52d84276bd8a27672cc5a477

0fdb9bbd52d84276bd8a27672cc5a477

123 ms

22759d35abf7fca8f7f2881fa49a588b

22759d35abf7fca8f7f2881fa49a588b

127 ms

d47cbce7d153a1cdf79536f6685839e0

d47cbce7d153a1cdf79536f6685839e0

127 ms

9d9fff691f266e051b1fa76cc3c1f5d9

9d9fff691f266e051b1fa76cc3c1f5d9

123 ms

2e4fe0a39c3b1992ca8cf3586d74e01f

2e4fe0a39c3b1992ca8cf3586d74e01f

128 ms

2e0ebdbc784df0f31c1805ccdc0d21fa

2e0ebdbc784df0f31c1805ccdc0d21fa

128 ms

8e442b0f63210d4db6fec003648ae954

8e442b0f63210d4db6fec003648ae954

127 ms

c757fa7b2d8e36238480a8308f2e74bf

c757fa7b2d8e36238480a8308f2e74bf

128 ms

d72023ff30b38924aaa29c4446f9749a

d72023ff30b38924aaa29c4446f9749a

129 ms

edusson-essay-magic-help.jpg

edusson-essay-magic-help.jpg

103 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

121 ms

questions.png

questions.png

102 ms

check.png

check.png

102 ms

ft1.png

ft1.png

102 ms

ft2.png

ft2.png

102 ms

ft3.png

ft3.png

129 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

131 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

122 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

129 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

624 ms

Accessibility Review

qa.studyfaq.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

qa.studyfaq.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

qa.studyfaq.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qa.studyfaq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qa.studyfaq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qa.studyfaq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of QA StudyFAQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: