Tools & Wizards About Us
read.startups.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

read.startups.com

Online Startup Accelerator | Startups.com

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

858 ms

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

read.startups.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to read.startups.com homepage info - get ready to check Read Startups best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about read.startups.com

Grow your startup like crazy without giving up a penny of equity. Get a Dedicated Startup Advisor backed by a community of founders and a suite of tools and perks to launch your business.

Visit read.startups.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Read.startups.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

read.startups.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,980 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.251

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

read.startups.com

12 ms

www.startups.com

141 ms

btj4ldz.css

39 ms

356 ms

chargebee.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Read.startups.com, 42% (13 requests) were made to Dq2uhp934kg74.cloudfront.net and 19% (6 requests) were made to Js.chargebee.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (356 ms) relates to the external source Js.stripe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 713.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

5.6 MB

After Optimization

4.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Read.startups.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 157.2 kB

  • Original 191.7 kB
  • After minification 191.4 kB
  • After compression 34.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 555.3 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Read Startups needs image optimization as it can save up to 555.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 85 B

  • Original 803.1 kB
  • After minification 803.1 kB
  • After compression 803.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 510 B

  • Original 727 B
  • After minification 595 B
  • After compression 217 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Read.startups.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 510 B or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (60%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Read Startups. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

read.startups.com

read.startups.com

12 ms

www.startups.com

www.startups.com

141 ms

btj4ldz.css

btj4ldz.css

39 ms

356 ms

chargebee.js

chargebee.js

43 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

52 ms

sco.js

sco.js

53 ms

vendors~Community-FounderGroupChakra-index-tsx~Community-Online~FundingAcceleratorLP~FundingAccelera~c4f07beb.chunk.js

vendors~Community-FounderGroupChakra-index-tsx~Community-Online~FundingAcceleratorLP~FundingAccelera~c4f07beb.chunk.js

56 ms

vendors~Community-Online~FundingAcceleratorLP~FundingAcceleratorRAC~FundingBootcampLP~FundingBootcam~1ec042c4.chunk.js

vendors~Community-Online~FundingAcceleratorLP~FundingAcceleratorRAC~FundingBootcampLP~FundingBootcam~1ec042c4.chunk.js

57 ms

vendors~FundingAcceleratorLP~FundingAcceleratorRAC~FundingBootcampLP~FundingBootcampPayment~FundingB~7e6db579.chunk.js

vendors~FundingAcceleratorLP~FundingAcceleratorRAC~FundingBootcampLP~FundingBootcampPayment~FundingB~7e6db579.chunk.js

57 ms

vendors~Home.chunk.js

vendors~Home.chunk.js

57 ms

Home.chunk.js

Home.chunk.js

58 ms

p.css

p.css

33 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

31 ms

how-it-works-w-labels.png

how-it-works-w-labels.png

18 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

dedicated-startup-advisor.png

dedicated-startup-advisor.png

33 ms

callout-rolodex.png

callout-rolodex.png

36 ms

mullenweg-fade.png

mullenweg-fade.png

35 ms

bumble-background.png

bumble-background.png

31 ms

live-chat.png

live-chat.png

31 ms

workshops-bg.png

workshops-bg.png

33 ms

d

d

2 ms

d

d

41 ms

d

d

56 ms

d

d

57 ms

210-d2f0a25d20c739a14d29.js

210-d2f0a25d20c739a14d29.js

24 ms

200-200f3804239193d3ae2d.js

200-200f3804239193d3ae2d.js

11 ms

animation.css

animation.css

45 ms

master.html

master.html

42 ms

master-c05480464ae0086c0e88.js

master-c05480464ae0086c0e88.js

140 ms

Accessibility Review

read.startups.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

read.startups.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

read.startups.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Read.startups.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Read.startups.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

read.startups.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Read Startups. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: