2.9 sec in total
160 ms
2.4 sec
312 ms
Welcome to research.systemsbiology.net homepage info - get ready to check Research Systems Biology best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about research.systemsbiology.net
Visit research.systemsbiology.netWe analyzed Research.systemsbiology.net page load time and found that the first response time was 160 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
research.systemsbiology.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.124
83/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
160 ms
827 ms
104 ms
141 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Research.systemsbiology.net, 80% (63 requests) were made to Systemsbiology.org and 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) relates to the external source Systemsbiology.org.
Page size can be reduced by 634.0 kB (37%)
1.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Research.systemsbiology.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 856.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Research Systems Biology images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 352.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 352.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 238.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Research.systemsbiology.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 238.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (79%)
68
14
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Research Systems Biology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
research.systemsbiology.net
160 ms
827 ms
academicons.css
104 ms
photoswipe.css
141 ms
default-skin.css
160 ms
custom-404-pro-public.css
178 ms
style.css
262 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.css
218 ms
style.css
255 ms
style-mobile.css
295 ms
css
50 ms
css
58 ms
css
40 ms
css
40 ms
organic-shortcodes.css
265 ms
font-awesome.css
306 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
302 ms
zotpress.shortcode.css
304 ms
photoswipe.min.js
371 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.min.js
340 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
340 ms
jquery.js
406 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
378 ms
custom-404-pro-public.js
378 ms
hoverIntent.js
391 ms
superfish.js
421 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
423 ms
jquery.isotope.js
455 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
423 ms
changes.css
429 ms
research.js
417 ms
style-mobile.css
416 ms
masonry.min.js
483 ms
base.js
482 ms
jquery.custom.js
482 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
483 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
532 ms
navigation.js
482 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
483 ms
jquery.color.min.js
483 ms
jquery.custom.js
506 ms
core.min.js
506 ms
widget.min.js
457 ms
accordion.min.js
432 ms
mouse.min.js
416 ms
resizable.min.js
481 ms
draggable.min.js
374 ms
button.min.js
351 ms
position.min.js
344 ms
dialog.min.js
325 ms
jquery.shortcodes.js
353 ms
tabs.min.js
317 ms
tabs.js
316 ms
wp-embed.min.js
309 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
385 ms
isb_white_orange_logo1.png
252 ms
isb_gray_blue_logo.png
252 ms
research3.jpg
449 ms
ISB-2987-HR-246x225.jpg
251 ms
ISB-1776-HR-246x225.jpg
350 ms
3-246x225.jpg
350 ms
bg1-246x225.jpg
349 ms
5-246x225.jpg
349 ms
environmentAlgae-246x225.jpg
349 ms
p4-medicine-246x225.jpg
351 ms
DSC_0702-246x225.jpg
352 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
62 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
74 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
102 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
128 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
130 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
130 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
130 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
355 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
309 ms
player_api
37 ms
www-widgetapi.js
58 ms
ga.js
151 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
research.systemsbiology.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
research.systemsbiology.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
research.systemsbiology.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Research.systemsbiology.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Research.systemsbiology.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
research.systemsbiology.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Research Systems Biology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: