3.9 sec in total
292 ms
3.4 sec
217 ms
Welcome to s1te.net homepage info - get ready to check S1TE best content right away, or after learning these important things about s1te.net
Creative Freelance Graphic and Web Designer based in Leicester, UK. Specialising in graphic design, website design, web hosting, graphics & more. S1TE UK
Visit s1te.netWe analyzed S1te.net page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
s1te.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
292 ms
855 ms
172 ms
514 ms
259 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original S1te.net, 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (855 ms) belongs to the original domain S1te.net.
Page size can be reduced by 550.8 kB (40%)
1.4 MB
831.9 kB
In fact, the total size of S1te.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 597.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 200.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, S1TE needs image optimization as it can save up to 200.6 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 171.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 171.7 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. S1te.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 119.1 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (63%)
76
28
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of S1TE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
s1te.net
292 ms
www.s1te.net
855 ms
headers.css
172 ms
shortcodes.css
514 ms
flexslider.css
259 ms
prettyPhoto.css
344 ms
style.css
258 ms
responsive.css
345 ms
style.min.css
428 ms
styles.css
347 ms
cookieNSCconsent.min.css
346 ms
jquery.min.js
520 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
432 ms
easing.js
445 ms
fitvids.js
515 ms
js
47 ms
1.js
25 ms
comment-reply.min.js
438 ms
index.js
443 ms
index.js
455 ms
cookieNSCconsent.min.js
518 ms
shortcodes.js
522 ms
bootstrap.js
522 ms
superfish.js
528 ms
mobilemenu.js
527 ms
waypoints.js
541 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
604 ms
functions.js
611 ms
prettyPhoto.js
611 ms
jquery.tweet.js
614 ms
api.js
41 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
616 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
628 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
775 ms
index.js
695 ms
akismet-frontend.js
698 ms
style.css
694 ms
s1te-website-background.jpg
183 ms
s1te-logo-header.png
100 ms
stripes.png
102 ms
charnwood-mechanical-ltd-logo-design-black-and-white-460x300.png
177 ms
overlay-link.png
100 ms
BeeArtistic-Duplication-Invoice-Pads-460x300.png
314 ms
BeeArtistic-Painting-Decorating-Website-Email-460x300.png
313 ms
BeeArtistic-Painter-Decorator-Business-Cards-Leicestershire-460x300.png
190 ms
glyphicons-halflings-white.png
184 ms
website-designer-leicestershire.png
314 ms
graphic-designer-leicestershire.png
313 ms
s1te-logo-300x91-300x91.png
349 ms
arrow4.png
349 ms
charnwood-mechanical-ltd-logo-design-black-and-white-60x60.png
356 ms
BeeArtistic-Duplication-Invoice-Pads-60x60.png
356 ms
BeeArtistic-Painting-Decorating-Website-Email-60x60.png
357 ms
BeeArtistic-Painter-Decorator-Business-Cards-Leicestershire-60x60.png
357 ms
blog_s1te_logo.gif
440 ms
twitter.png
415 ms
facebook.png
420 ms
skype.png
419 ms
instagram.png
421 ms
youtube.png
420 ms
pinterest.png
503 ms
rss.png
505 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
512 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
recaptcha__en.js
66 ms
client.json
407 ms
client.json
414 ms
collect
56 ms
anchor
43 ms
js
99 ms
styles__ltr.css
3 ms
recaptcha__en.js
9 ms
sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js
33 ms
webworker.js
89 ms
logo_48.png
21 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
82 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
92 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
93 ms
recaptcha__en.js
45 ms
visit
298 ms
205.svg
74 ms
retina.css
89 ms
visit
66 ms
s1te.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
s1te.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
s1te.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise S1te.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that S1te.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
s1te.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of S1TE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: