6.9 sec in total
1.7 sec
4.8 sec
340 ms
Visit sacada2.net now to see the best up-to-date Sacada2 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sacada2.net
Amazon Top Products, kindle, laptop, desktop computers, iPhone, ipad, tablets and more...
Visit sacada2.netWe analyzed Sacada2.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
sacada2.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
1689 ms
55 ms
74 ms
72 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Sacada2.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Sacada2.net.
Page size can be reduced by 748.3 kB (55%)
1.4 MB
607.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Sacada2.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 620.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sacada2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 431.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 431.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 195.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sacada2.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (68%)
75
24
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sacada2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sacada2.net
1689 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
55 ms
styles.css
74 ms
slidebox-light.css
72 ms
css
27 ms
swstyleops.css
78 ms
swstatstyle.css
80 ms
jquery.js
119 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
87 ms
jquery.form.min.js
105 ms
slidebox.js
106 ms
fluidimage.js
110 ms
swp.js
136 ms
backstretch.js
139 ms
modernizr.js
141 ms
utils.min.js
144 ms
plupload.full.min.js
189 ms
front.js
152 ms
q
17 ms
boot-cont.css
159 ms
buttons.min.css
156 ms
dashicons.min.css
256 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
172 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
253 ms
media-views.min.css
254 ms
imgareaselect.css
254 ms
front.css
255 ms
scripts.js
257 ms
underscore.min.js
257 ms
shortcode.min.js
259 ms
backbone.min.js
260 ms
wp-util.min.js
259 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
260 ms
media-models.min.js
269 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
269 ms
core.min.js
269 ms
widget.min.js
277 ms
mouse.min.js
276 ms
sortable.min.js
312 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
281 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
265 ms
media-views.min.js
292 ms
media-editor.min.js
256 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
491 ms
getad
73 ms
overlaybg.png
114 ms
cropped-sacada2.net-logo.png
126 ms
51nHbuhKnqL.jpg
177 ms
clock.png
156 ms
51RfldFOukL.jpg
222 ms
41eHMNiqrJL.jpg
197 ms
41hmyhKEl4L.jpg
180 ms
41Dk-2BMt49GL.jpg
198 ms
51QT1oYklLL.jpg
255 ms
31pUjBZKGiL.jpg
225 ms
41Cxmc27C7L.jpg
232 ms
41IqAP5qG-L.jpg
282 ms
51a7lDlQ9HL.jpg
292 ms
json
35 ms
517-2BbC0jxkL.jpg
291 ms
316sl-SZw1L.jpg
247 ms
rss.png
261 ms
516yfWz9wrL-50x50.jpg
284 ms
reviewstars.png
286 ms
close.gif
294 ms
q
42 ms
css
20 ms
amazon_homepage_assoc_728x90_2.2.png
14 ms
json
5 ms
9 ms
ir
10 ms
loading.gif
40 ms
controls.png
40 ms
arrows-000000.png
41 ms
swstyleops_tablet.css
40 ms
swstyleops_phone.css
39 ms
sacada2.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sacada2.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sacada2.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sacada2.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sacada2.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sacada2.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sacada2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: