Tools & Wizards About Us
sacramentopolygraph.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

sacramentopolygraph.com

Sacramento Polygraph $195 and up | Sacramento Lie Detector

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

422 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

474 ms

sacramentopolygraph.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sacramentopolygraph.com now to see the best up-to-date Sacramento Polygraph content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sacramentopolygraph.com

Sacramento Polygraph Examinations - INSTANT Sacramento lie detector results - FREE written reports - Sacramento lie detector test.

Visit sacramentopolygraph.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sacramentopolygraph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 422 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sacramentopolygraph.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,850 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sacramentopolygraph.com

422 ms

3nxy8o0aQTg

133 ms

grogan_polygraph_r1_c1.jpg

105 ms

grogan_polygraph_r1_c3.jpg

101 ms

grogan_polygraph_r2_c6.jpg

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Sacramentopolygraph.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (629 ms) belongs to the original domain Sacramentopolygraph.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sacramentopolygraph.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 18.5 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.0 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 82.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sacramento Polygraph images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 167.6 kB
  • After minification 167.6 kB
  • After compression 165.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 61.4 kB
  • After minification 61.4 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sacramentopolygraph.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (18%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

40

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sacramento Polygraph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sacramentopolygraph.com

sacramentopolygraph.com

422 ms

3nxy8o0aQTg

3nxy8o0aQTg

133 ms

grogan_polygraph_r1_c1.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r1_c1.jpg

105 ms

grogan_polygraph_r1_c3.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r1_c3.jpg

101 ms

grogan_polygraph_r2_c6.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r2_c6.jpg

101 ms

grogan_polygraph_r2_c1.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r2_c1.jpg

178 ms

grogan_polygraph_r2_c7.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r2_c7.jpg

178 ms

grogan_polygraph_r3_c7.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r3_c7.jpg

105 ms

grogan_polygraph_r7_c1.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r7_c1.jpg

177 ms

grogan_polygraph_r4_c1.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r4_c1.jpg

177 ms

badge.jpg

badge.jpg

178 ms

cape.jpg

cape.jpg

178 ms

arizona_polygraph.jpg

arizona_polygraph.jpg

416 ms

new_york_polygraph.jpg

new_york_polygraph.jpg

416 ms

phone.jpg

phone.jpg

416 ms

need%20the%20best%20polygraph%20in%20Sacramento.png

need%20the%20best%20polygraph%20in%20Sacramento.png

417 ms

polygraph%20Sacramento%20CA.jpg

polygraph%20Sacramento%20CA.jpg

416 ms

the%20Sacramento%20lie%20detector.png

the%20Sacramento%20lie%20detector.png

428 ms

In%20Sacramento%20no%20inconclusive%20polygraph.jpg

In%20Sacramento%20no%20inconclusive%20polygraph.jpg

429 ms

results%20of%20a%20Sacramento%20polygraph%20examination.jpg

results%20of%20a%20Sacramento%20polygraph%20examination.jpg

619 ms

accuracy%20of%20a%20Sacramento%20polygraph.jpg

accuracy%20of%20a%20Sacramento%20polygraph.jpg

428 ms

lie%20detector%20in%20Sacramento%20today.jpg

lie%20detector%20in%20Sacramento%20today.jpg

427 ms

lie%20detector%20test%20Sacramento%20today.png

lie%20detector%20test%20Sacramento%20today.png

428 ms

10000%20polygraph%20tests%20Sacramento.png

10000%20polygraph%20tests%20Sacramento.png

541 ms

Sacramento%20lie%20detector%20test%20accuracy.png

Sacramento%20lie%20detector%20test%20accuracy.png

496 ms

take%20a%20polygraph%20test%20in%20Sacramento%20on%20weekend.jpg

take%20a%20polygraph%20test%20in%20Sacramento%20on%20weekend.jpg

579 ms

Sacramento%20polygraph%20exam%20weekend.png

Sacramento%20polygraph%20exam%20weekend.png

499 ms

lie%20detector%20testing%20Sacramento%20California.jpg

lie%20detector%20testing%20Sacramento%20California.jpg

496 ms

Sacramento%20polygraph%20court.jpg

Sacramento%20polygraph%20court.jpg

629 ms

grogan.jpg

grogan.jpg

500 ms

financing.jpg

financing.jpg

499 ms

20_years.jpg

20_years.jpg

574 ms

grogan_polygraph_r5_c10.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r5_c10.jpg

574 ms

grogan_polygraph_r4_c10.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r4_c10.jpg

575 ms

asseenontv.gif

asseenontv.gif

575 ms

peoa.jpg

peoa.jpg

583 ms

pcsot.jpg

pcsot.jpg

583 ms

astm.jpg

astm.jpg

588 ms

grogan_polygraph_r8_c8.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r8_c8.jpg

570 ms

grogan_polygraph_r8_c1.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r8_c1.jpg

575 ms

grogan_polygraph_r8_c9.jpg

grogan_polygraph_r8_c9.jpg

577 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

8 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

24 ms

base.js

base.js

49 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

151 ms

vbkapfeAy33t-zFWekGq0V21dvEp2e-S_0wOHkCyMZ0.js

vbkapfeAy33t-zFWekGq0V21dvEp2e-S_0wOHkCyMZ0.js

90 ms

embed.js

embed.js

32 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

31 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

32 ms

id

id

21 ms

Create

Create

87 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

12 ms

Accessibility Review

sacramentopolygraph.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

sacramentopolygraph.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sacramentopolygraph.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sacramentopolygraph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sacramentopolygraph.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sacramentopolygraph.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sacramento Polygraph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: