2.7 sec in total
82 ms
2.4 sec
268 ms
Visit sacredsites.com now to see the best up-to-date Sacred Sites content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sacredsites.com
World Pilgrimage Guide by National Geographic photographer Martin Gray. Information, pictures, maps of 1500 holy places and sacred sites in 160 countries. Myth, archaeology, religion, spiritual, histo...
Visit sacredsites.comWe analyzed Sacredsites.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
sacredsites.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value6,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.391
26/100
15%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
82 ms
352 ms
42 ms
82 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Sacredsites.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (571 ms) relates to the external source Syndication.twitter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 911.2 kB (23%)
4.0 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Sacredsites.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sacred Sites images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 386.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 386.9 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 411.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sacredsites.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 411.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (64%)
80
29
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sacred Sites. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sacredsites.com
82 ms
sacredsites.com
352 ms
template.css
42 ms
cwsl-horizontal.css
82 ms
content.css
101 ms
bootstrap.min.css
102 ms
81fbe0a310dfd55152790965c6dfcd18.css
148 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
144 ms
behaviour.js
116 ms
jquery.min.js
188 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
134 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
139 ms
widgets.js
86 ms
core.js
156 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
176 ms
jquery.modals.min.js
173 ms
script.min.js
185 ms
bootstrap.min.js
243 ms
dojo.js
194 ms
dojo.xd.js
37 ms
6d1ca1c18bc20a4e34bf83511d5ca98a.js
209 ms
dropdown.js
58 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
256 ms
init.js
256 ms
uikit2-336d378d.js
257 ms
wk-scripts-6e08b1e5.js
255 ms
bootstrap.css
295 ms
theme.css
316 ms
custom.css
266 ms
uikit.js
306 ms
autocomplete.js
268 ms
search.js
288 ms
datepicker.js
325 ms
sticky.js
305 ms
tooltip.js
326 ms
social.js
342 ms
theme.js
343 ms
js
85 ms
pinit.js
46 ms
css
41 ms
css
66 ms
uacss.xd.js
13 ms
css
28 ms
css
35 ms
css
33 ms
default_bg.jpg
195 ms
Cheju-Do.jpg
196 ms
Easter-Island-Aku-Aku-view.jpg
301 ms
Golden-Temple.jpg
195 ms
Mecca-Great-Mosque.jpg
429 ms
Meteora-Rousanou.jpg
243 ms
Mt-Olympus.jpg
302 ms
Parthenon.jpg
243 ms
Stonehenge-aerial.jpg
299 ms
Uxmal-Pyramid-of-Magician.jpg
308 ms
White-Sands.jpg
308 ms
secret-sacred-sties-250.jpg
373 ms
barnes-and-noble-buy-button-200.png
373 ms
buy.gif
372 ms
all.js
149 ms
IMHTlOJrzX0
281 ms
4b2348706bee4566a401ad82b45f8c36.png
348 ms
magnifier_strong_mid.png
348 ms
panel-box-noise-bg.png
395 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
208 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf
93 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf
149 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
160 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
206 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
159 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
159 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
266 ms
all.js
53 ms
pinit_main.js
65 ms
164 ms
www-player.css
32 ms
www-embed-player.js
96 ms
base.js
159 ms
settings
571 ms
ad_status.js
421 ms
jRYISRuM9q7e_xyYaLp_fsq3qnLjbNevd8JDa-bOkpI.js
312 ms
embed.js
33 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
137 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
137 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
162 ms
id
158 ms
Create
283 ms
Create
280 ms
Create
414 ms
embeds
240 ms
tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en-gb.html
236 ms
sacredsites.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
sacredsites.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sacredsites.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sacredsites.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sacredsites.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sacredsites.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sacred Sites. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: