Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

sadsack.net

Sad Sack Net, The Official Sad Sack Comics Web Site.

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

115 ms

sadsack.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sadsack.net homepage info - get ready to check Sad Sack best content right away, or after learning these important things about sadsack.net

The Official Web Site of the Classic Harvey Comics, Cartoon, and Motion Picture Character the Sad Sack.

Visit sadsack.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sadsack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sadsack.net performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sadsack.net

147 ms

sadsack.net

428 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

224 ms

bootstrap.min.css

253 ms

bootstrap.min.js

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Sadsack.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (428 ms) belongs to the original domain Sadsack.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.7 kB (19%)

Content Size

248.0 kB

After Optimization

200.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Sadsack.net main page is 248.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 123.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.3 kB
  • After minification 6.2 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 123.3 kB
  • After minification 106.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sad Sack needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 51.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 55.3 kB
  • After minification 55.3 kB
  • After compression 41.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sadsack.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (40%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sad Sack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sadsack.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

sadsack.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sadsack.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sadsack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sadsack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sad Sack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: