5 sec in total
456 ms
4.3 sec
206 ms
Welcome to saf.ro homepage info - get ready to check SAF best content right away, or after learning these important things about saf.ro
Just another WordPress site
Visit saf.roWe analyzed Saf.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
saf.ro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value12.9 s
2/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
456 ms
1242 ms
128 ms
258 ms
700 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Saf.ro, 51% (45 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Saf.ro.
Page size can be reduced by 219.4 kB (19%)
1.2 MB
936.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Saf.ro main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 631.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SAF needs image optimization as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saf.ro has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (74%)
42
11
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SAF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
saf.ro
456 ms
www.saf.ro
1242 ms
style.min.css
128 ms
styles.css
258 ms
be.css
700 ms
animations.min.css
350 ms
fontawesome.css
479 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.min.css
363 ms
responsive.css
383 ms
css
30 ms
gdpr-main-nf.css
467 ms
jquery.min.js
648 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
502 ms
css
25 ms
post-2.css
552 ms
rs6.css
588 ms
index.js
597 ms
index.js
626 ms
rbtools.min.js
1140 ms
rs6.min.js
1060 ms
core.min.js
755 ms
tabs.min.js
755 ms
debouncedresize.min.js
801 ms
magnificpopup.min.js
819 ms
menu.js
851 ms
visible.min.js
875 ms
animations.min.js
931 ms
jplayer.min.js
939 ms
enllax.min.js
970 ms
translate3d.js
999 ms
scripts.js
1177 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1054 ms
main.js
1211 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1123 ms
isotope.min.js
1176 ms
logo-saf-normal.png
451 ms
dummy.png
520 ms
logo.png
559 ms
2.png
1027 ms
1.png
1178 ms
home_car_section_sep.png
583 ms
home_car_pic1.jpg
961 ms
gdpr-logo.png
644 ms
home_car_footer_bg.png
699 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
54 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
59 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4vaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
62 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5OaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
62 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5caVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
62 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4iaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4jaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4saVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
77 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
77 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4taVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
80 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4vaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
78 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B5OaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B5caVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
80 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4iaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4jaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4saVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
81 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4kaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
81 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4taVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
81 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4vaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x5OaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x5caVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4iaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4jaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4saVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4kaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4taVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
85 ms
esDQ311QOP6BJUr4zfKHv70OEg.woff
213 ms
esDQ311QOP6BJUr4w_KHv70OEqin.woff
229 ms
esDQ311QOP6BJUr4zvKHv70OEqin.woff
219 ms
esDQ311QOP6BJUr4wfKHv70OEqin.woff
108 ms
esDT311QOP6BJUrwdteUkp8FOJKuGA.woff
200 ms
esDT311QOP6BJUrwdteUnJ8FOJKuGPLB.woff
154 ms
esDT311QOP6BJUrwdteUkZ8FOJKuGPLB.woff
75 ms
esDT311QOP6BJUrwdteUnp8FOJKuGPLB.woff
138 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
104 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
113 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
114 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
116 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
120 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
109 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kvnz.woff
119 ms
saf.ro accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
saf.ro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
saf.ro SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RO
RO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saf.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saf.ro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
saf.ro
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SAF. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: