2.1 sec in total
92 ms
705 ms
1.3 sec
Welcome to safe.searchprotection.online homepage info - get ready to check Safe Search Protection best content right away, or after learning these important things about safe.searchprotection.online
Latest news coverage, email, free stock quotes, live scores and video are just the beginning. Discover more every day at Yahoo!
Visit safe.searchprotection.onlineWe analyzed Safe.searchprotection.online page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
safe.searchprotection.online performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value3,440 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value27.6 s
0/100
10%
92 ms
377 ms
83 ms
98 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Safe.searchprotection.online, 91% (63 requests) were made to S.yimg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Yahoo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) relates to the external source Yahoo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (42%)
2.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Safe.searchprotection.online main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Safe Search Protection images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 36 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safe.searchprotection.online has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (60%)
62
25
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safe Search Protection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
safe.searchprotection.online
92 ms
www.yahoo.com
377 ms
wf-loader-2.7.21.js
83 ms
cmp.js
98 ms
consent.js
101 ms
tdv2-wafer-utils.customErrorHandler.bcda778b736c3a054af62f437b536e78.js
82 ms
fpDesktop.46ec7cd52ee9f5c1236b0dea5072690a.js
81 ms
benji-2.1.127.js
81 ms
wf-caas-1.36.6.js
88 ms
wf-toggle-1.15.4.js
88 ms
react-wafer-featurebar.custom.default.95a7979b4c06295e22960043d003fb49.js
88 ms
wf-video-3.2.2.js
88 ms
wf-text-1.2.0.js
91 ms
wf-bind-1.1.3.js
92 ms
wf-image-1.4.0.js
92 ms
wf-rapid-1.10.9.js
92 ms
wf-beacon-1.3.4.js
92 ms
wf-fetch-1.19.1.js
92 ms
wf-lightbox-1.10.6.js
97 ms
wf-scrollview-2.23.3.js
97 ms
wf-countdown-1.2.5.js
95 ms
wf-benji-1.2.0.js
95 ms
wf-clipboard-copy-1.0.2.js
96 ms
wf-form-1.34.5.js
105 ms
wf-native-da-1.0.5.js
105 ms
wf-action-1.8.1.js
105 ms
wf-template-1.4.3.js
108 ms
wf-menu-1.3.5.js
105 ms
react-wafer-stream.custom.default.34fba140d46159f80d116c63459e57e7.js
107 ms
wf-sticky-1.2.6.js
107 ms
968bcd3.caas-news_web.min.js
109 ms
privacy-choice-control.png
75 ms
cerebro_min.js
34 ms
Regular.woff
47 ms
Medium.woff
46 ms
Light.woff
47 ms
ExtraLight.woff
66 ms
Semibold.woff
45 ms
58ab30b0-805e-11ef-a47f-e74474cc4c57.cf.jpg
39 ms
625dd3c0-802b-11ef-ae3f-086f241fc9dd.cf.jpg
37 ms
22897760-802e-11ef-ba5e-36b91c10c78c.cf.jpg
38 ms
061761d0-801c-11ef-bdf7-25cfbbd38116.cf.jpg
36 ms
22e12bf0-803c-11ef-97fd-ef2be118927e.cf.jpg
38 ms
5397af50-8030-11ef-bce7-f7cbf3c7c2c8.cf.jpg
37 ms
45b54fd0-8064-11ef-bfee-f34d5e07f654.cf.jpg
48 ms
8c9a3aafc8ec1ea300ac5b03c5084a03.cf.jpg
42 ms
9e9d9cf0-6477-11ef-9ed7-a86bff18e3bf.cf.jpg
43 ms
32cb4b552d893091a14be16133aa4398.cf.jpg
43 ms
83c18a30-7e4f-11ef-bf1a-ce8e48d57599.cf.jpg
43 ms
9ef9d290-8056-11ef-af7f-cc79a3e18da1.cf.jpg
41 ms
spaceball.gif
40 ms
009c84e31a0c91950ae99e8de26a4505.cf.jpg
12 ms
8f1272092d103aa41d50794d9448eebf.cf.jpg
7 ms
d127e806696d1c7ac9436b3ef2f75185.cf.jpg
8 ms
f6055ba0-8050-11ef-bfbf-9878050bcc22.cf.jpg
188 ms
92ec33852f77bab289a9f8134b9fce6e.cf.jpg
9 ms
15e77e3f56a754c09ac3ed2357ec0147.cf.jpg
7 ms
efa359da870577b320877bcae8fe7582.cf.jpg
8 ms
trendingNow.yhome-atomic.c9493b0439b3a8ef64a3f6b7f532117c.min.css
7 ms
trendingNow-flameIcon.yhome-variable.a2368adb8251677d29ac1399a6f34c43.min.css
8 ms
analytics-3.54.3.js
33 ms
wf-core-1.65.1.js
36 ms
desktop_1.11.185.js
36 ms
homepage-pwa-defer-1.1.6.js
183 ms
safe.min.js
57 ms
advertisement_0.0.19.js
57 ms
cs_1.6.6.js
92 ms
exp.json
6 ms
perf-vitals_3.3.0.js
20 ms
safe.searchprotection.online accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
safe.searchprotection.online best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
safe.searchprotection.online SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safe.searchprotection.online can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safe.searchprotection.online main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
safe.searchprotection.online
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Safe Search Protection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: