Tools & Wizards About Us
safetyfordesign.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

safetyfordesign.co.uk

SAFETY FOR

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

985 ms

Page Rendered

324 ms

safetyfordesign.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to safetyfordesign.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check SAFETY Fordesign best content right away, or after learning these important things about safetyfordesign.co.uk

Visit safetyfordesign.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Safetyfordesign.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

safetyfordesign.co.uk performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,970 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.147

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

safetyfordesign.co.uk

24 ms

www.safetyfor.co.uk

156 ms

css2

90 ms

legacy.js

84 ms

modern.js

250 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Safetyfordesign.co.uk, 38% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 33% (8 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 234.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

6.9 MB

After Optimization

6.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Safetyfordesign.co.uk main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 212.7 kB

  • Original 246.8 kB
  • After minification 212.7 kB
  • After compression 34.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 212.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SAFETY Fordesign images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB
  • After compression 3.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 135 B

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 15.3 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safetyfordesign.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SAFETY Fordesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

safetyfordesign.co.uk

safetyfordesign.co.uk

24 ms

www.safetyfor.co.uk

www.safetyfor.co.uk

156 ms

css2

css2

90 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

84 ms

modern.js

modern.js

250 ms

extract-css-runtime-f057f4e0fb1f1cc43390-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-f057f4e0fb1f1cc43390-min.en-US.js

249 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-82d5a604aeb33b642fa7-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-82d5a604aeb33b642fa7-min.en-US.js

253 ms

cldr-resource-pack-ee8b113d18003c69b1d0-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-ee8b113d18003c69b1d0-min.en-US.js

248 ms

common-vendors-stable-82f1d6ae85195a971a86-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-82f1d6ae85195a971a86-min.en-US.js

270 ms

common-vendors-1f4024b64315c2afc35d-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-1f4024b64315c2afc35d-min.en-US.js

280 ms

common-4d2d429324ed3e51a748-min.en-US.js

common-4d2d429324ed3e51a748-min.en-US.js

443 ms

performance-0d31923e6a842fec8871-min.en-US.js

performance-0d31923e6a842fec8871-min.en-US.js

249 ms

site.css

site.css

84 ms

js

js

299 ms

static.css

static.css

82 ms

site-bundle.4df6f348a832dc61e261a099a8ca9b31.js

site-bundle.4df6f348a832dc61e261a099a8ca9b31.js

199 ms

Screenshot+2022-08-01+at+10.10.41.png

Screenshot+2022-08-01+at+10.10.41.png

275 ms

AdobeStock_322597243+%281%29.jpeg

AdobeStock_322597243+%281%29.jpeg

612 ms

AdobeStock_283018279.jpeg

AdobeStock_283018279.jpeg

601 ms

AdobeStock_262333851.jpeg

AdobeStock_262333851.jpeg

610 ms

AdobeStock_367881171.jpeg

AdobeStock_367881171.jpeg

599 ms

AdobeStock_332749888+%281%29.jpeg

AdobeStock_332749888+%281%29.jpeg

603 ms

AdobeStock_137423796.jpeg

AdobeStock_137423796.jpeg

598 ms

AdobeStock_341776315.jpeg

AdobeStock_341776315.jpeg

604 ms

Accessibility Review

safetyfordesign.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

safetyfordesign.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

safetyfordesign.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safetyfordesign.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safetyfordesign.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

safetyfordesign.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SAFETY Fordesign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: