5.2 sec in total
344 ms
4.7 sec
153 ms
Visit safetytest.de now to see the best up-to-date SAFETYTEST content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about safetytest.de
Effiziente Prüfmanagement-Lösungen für ✓ elektrische Arbeitsmittel ✓ Maschinen und ✓ Anlagen. Hier geht es zu unseren VDE Prüfgeräten.
Visit safetytest.deWe analyzed Safetytest.de page load time and found that the first response time was 344 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
safetytest.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value460 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
344 ms
1255 ms
199 ms
207 ms
508 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Safetytest.de, 82% (37 requests) were made to Safetytest.eu and 7% (3 requests) were made to Image.providesupport.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Safetytest.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 642.5 kB (39%)
1.7 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Safetytest.de main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 896.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SAFETYTEST needs image optimization as it can save up to 106.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 428.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 428.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safetytest.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (64%)
42
15
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SAFETYTEST. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
safetytest.de
344 ms
1255 ms
template.css
199 ms
mijosearch.css
207 ms
mootools-core.js
508 ms
core.js
210 ms
caption.js
208 ms
mootools-more.js
1132 ms
autocompleter.js
299 ms
system.css
308 ms
general.css
310 ms
template.css
419 ms
template.responsive.css
418 ms
jquery.js
711 ms
script.js
538 ms
script.responsive.js
538 ms
style.css
539 ms
css
23 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
806 ms
modernizr.custom.28468.js
623 ms
jquery.cslider.js
621 ms
system.css
104 ms
header.jpg
114 ms
en.gif
117 ms
de.gif
115 ms
1STbig.png
315 ms
3ST_Slideshow.png
610 ms
A3-S_63A_rightSlideshow.png
499 ms
1N_rightSlideshow.png
502 ms
isoguard_ht.png
549 ms
3S_rightSlideshow.png
717 ms
1STthumb.png
626 ms
search-input.png
584 ms
object1154324429.png
587 ms
object636892499.png
636 ms
menuseparator.png
686 ms
spacer.gif
689 ms
ga.js
12 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
style10.gif
602 ms
arrows.png
620 ms
UK4l2VEpwjv3gdcwbwXE9InF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
55 ms
safe-standard.js
40 ms
offline-20214912.png
46 ms
0d6huxap7p6010xiqleuw0u5vi
19 ms
safetytest.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
safetytest.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
safetytest.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safetytest.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Safetytest.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
safetytest.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SAFETYTEST. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: