2.7 sec in total
249 ms
1.8 sec
647 ms
Click here to check amazing Safetytrack content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about safetytrack.net
Our Fleet Management Solutions provide live video and GPS tracking. Manage your fleet with our Live Streaming Fleet Cameras.
Visit safetytrack.netWe analyzed Safetytrack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 249 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
safetytrack.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value21,670 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value36.1 s
0/100
10%
249 ms
31 ms
64 ms
34 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Safetytrack.net, 29% (37 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (501 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 461.1 kB (22%)
2.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Safetytrack.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 412.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 412.3 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Safetytrack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (75%)
84
21
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safetytrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
safetytrack.net
249 ms
style.min.css
31 ms
frontend.css
64 ms
b65bf16.css
34 ms
public.css
41 ms
jet-menu-general.css
45 ms
bad68db.css
49 ms
jet-elements.css
52 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
51 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
48 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
46 ms
frontend.min.css
67 ms
font-awesome.min.css
106 ms
frontend.min.css
84 ms
frontend.min.css
67 ms
all.min.css
101 ms
v4-shims.min.css
57 ms
flatpickr.min.css
107 ms
css
118 ms
fontawesome.min.css
109 ms
solid.min.css
112 ms
brands.min.css
108 ms
js
149 ms
jquery.min.js
113 ms
webfont.min.js
114 ms
utils.min.js
112 ms
v4-shims.min.js
114 ms
js
293 ms
animations.min.css
101 ms
wc-quick-view.js
99 ms
underscore.min.js
99 ms
frontend.min.js
125 ms
vue.min.js
126 ms
jet-menu-public-scripts.js
127 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
126 ms
url-polyfill.min.js
125 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
127 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
129 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
128 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
126 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
116 ms
hooks.min.js
115 ms
i18n.min.js
119 ms
frontend.min.js
114 ms
waypoints.min.js
111 ms
core.min.js
111 ms
swiper.min.js
111 ms
share-link.min.js
100 ms
dialog.min.js
98 ms
frontend.min.js
98 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
89 ms
jet-elements.min.js
88 ms
widgets-scripts.js
67 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
64 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
63 ms
wp-util.min.js
60 ms
frontend.min.js
62 ms
flatpickr.min.js
58 ms
lazyload.min.js
58 ms
css
84 ms
analytics.js
284 ms
js
281 ms
fbevents.js
282 ms
safetytrack-logo300.png
269 ms
architecture-1837176_1920.jpg
378 ms
SafetyTracksGPSTrailerTrackingSystem.png
230 ms
background.jpg
230 ms
WidgetScript
258 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYw.woff
235 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff
238 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff
376 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYw.woff
424 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff
424 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYw.woff
422 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
423 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
424 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
423 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
426 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
428 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
427 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
89 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
89 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
86 ms
j8_46_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-dYyZAC4O.woff
428 ms
j8_16_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT2hq-K.woff
427 ms
j8_46_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-LY2ZAC4O.woff
428 ms
j8_46_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-SY6ZAC4O.woff
429 ms
j8_76_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-5Z-OJw0.woff
429 ms
j8_46_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-WYuZAC4O.woff
430 ms
j8_46_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-PYqZAC4O.woff
429 ms
j8_46_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-IYmZAC4O.woff
431 ms
j8_46_LD37rqfuwxyIuaZhE6cRXOLtm2gfT-BYiZAC4O.woff
431 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3t-4s51oq.woff
492 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3q-0s51oq.woff
493 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3j-ws51oq.woff
493 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E30-8s51oq.woff
493 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3_-gs51oq.woff
494 ms
7cHpv4kjgoGqM7E_DMs_.woff
496 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3p-ks51oq.woff
495 ms
7cHqv4kjgoGqM7E3w-os51oq.woff
496 ms
7cHrv4kjgoGqM7E3b_s7wHk.woff
497 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsI.woff
497 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsI.woff
498 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsI.woff
500 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff
499 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsI.woff
498 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKQ.woff
501 ms
jupiterx.woff
228 ms
PN_zRfy9qWD8fEagAPg9pT8.woff
272 ms
blog1a-1024x684.jpg
139 ms
identity.js
108 ms
422141629240818
193 ms
collect
90 ms
logistics-management-1024x683.jpg
91 ms
1024_1200331_xlarge.jpg
318 ms
MicrosoftTeams-image-2-300x143.png
88 ms
Mosquito-Joe-1-1-300x143.png
89 ms
propane-services-1-300x143.jpg
87 ms
servpro-logo-1-300x143.png
162 ms
UofM-artwork-2-300x143.png
168 ms
VCC-Color-resize-jpg-2-300x143.jpg
96 ms
weedman-USA-1-300x143.png
169 ms
Levy-Logo-2-300x143.png
163 ms
Leafguard-logo-300x143.jpg
172 ms
120px-5_stars.png
172 ms
SafetyTrack-footlogo-pu374vrmx9npjwbv6ng5s82p77xmzxaxotnqezqxm8.png
170 ms
safetytrack.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
safetytrack.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
safetytrack.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safetytrack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safetytrack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
safetytrack.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Safetytrack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: