Tools & Wizards About Us
sageamber.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

sageamber.com

S&A赛吉琥珀

Page Load Speed

9.6 sec in total

First Response

727 ms

Resources Loaded

8.2 sec

Page Rendered

750 ms

sageamber.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sageamber content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sageamber.com

S&A珠宝设计

Visit sageamber.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sageamber.com page load time and found that the first response time was 727 ms and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sageamber.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.222

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sageamber.com

727 ms

font-awesome.css

231 ms

flaticon.css

445 ms

bootstrap.css

680 ms

revolution-slider.css

487 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Sageamber.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sageamber.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 312.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sageamber.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 55.3 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sageamber images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 218.9 kB

  • Original 400.3 kB
  • After minification 400.3 kB
  • After compression 181.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 218.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 90.2 kB
  • After minification 88.5 kB
  • After compression 76.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sageamber.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (55%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sageamber. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sageamber.com

sageamber.com

727 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

231 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

445 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

680 ms

revolution-slider.css

revolution-slider.css

487 ms

animate.css

animate.css

454 ms

hover.css

hover.css

491 ms

owl.css

owl.css

483 ms

scrollbar.css

scrollbar.css

670 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

684 ms

style.css

style.css

723 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

720 ms

tk.css

tk.css

730 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

893 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1134 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

912 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

963 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

968 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

1210 ms

rev-plugins.js

rev-plugins.js

1351 ms

revolution.min.js

revolution.min.js

1367 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

1199 ms

fitvids.js

fitvids.js

1199 ms

jquery-parallax.js

jquery-parallax.js

1359 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

1414 ms

scrollbar.js

scrollbar.js

1444 ms

validate.js

validate.js

1451 ms

wow.js

wow.js

1573 ms

script.js

script.js

1582 ms

1703646308162652.png

1703646308162652.png

851 ms

1713756026186640.jpg

1713756026186640.jpg

3790 ms

1713756052843315.jpg

1713756052843315.jpg

4149 ms

1713756072520066.jpg

1713756072520066.jpg

3862 ms

1715672279567632.jpg

1715672279567632.jpg

3851 ms

1715674418384501.jpg

1715674418384501.jpg

3309 ms

1699447025639054.jpg

1699447025639054.jpg

1519 ms

1718186350761770.jpg

1718186350761770.jpg

2683 ms

1718186389379892.jpg

1718186389379892.jpg

3826 ms

1718186408909426.jpg

1718186408909426.jpg

4581 ms

1718186433627273.jpg

1718186433627273.jpg

4582 ms

1718243331653952.jpg

1718243331653952.jpg

4820 ms

1718186470287837.jpg

1718186470287837.jpg

4815 ms

1718242185155469.jpg

1718242185155469.jpg

4647 ms

1718186521797947.jpg

1718186521797947.jpg

5121 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

4768 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4828 ms

flaticon.ttf

flaticon.ttf

457 ms

sageamber.com

sageamber.com

275 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

687 ms

sageamber.com

sageamber.com

266 ms

sageamber.com

sageamber.com

264 ms

sageamber.com

sageamber.com

265 ms

Accessibility Review

sageamber.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

sageamber.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sageamber.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sageamber.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Sageamber.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sageamber.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sageamber. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: