10.7 sec in total
1.6 sec
8.2 sec
923 ms
Welcome to sagestringquartet.com homepage info - get ready to check Sage String Quartet best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sagestringquartet.com
Visit sagestringquartet.comWe analyzed Sagestringquartet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sagestringquartet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value10.2 s
9/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.382
27/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
1639 ms
171 ms
167 ms
183 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Sagestringquartet.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sagestringquartet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (39%)
4.2 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sagestringquartet.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 225.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sage String Quartet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 885.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 885.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 440.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sagestringquartet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 440.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (52%)
90
43
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sage String Quartet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sagestringquartet.com
1639 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
171 ms
styles.css
167 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
183 ms
woocommerce.css
186 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
141 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
140 ms
rgs.css
228 ms
font-awesome.min.css
238 ms
style.css
389 ms
responsive.css
262 ms
jquery.js
408 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
modernizr.js
301 ms
jspullquotes-core.css
315 ms
Default.css
354 ms
jspullquotes.js
357 ms
jquery.form.min.js
498 ms
scripts.js
368 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
504 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
503 ms
woocommerce.min.js
512 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
515 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
514 ms
superfish.js
517 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
519 ms
easing.js
521 ms
respond.js
523 ms
swipe.min.js
536 ms
nicescroll.js
600 ms
sticky.js
591 ms
prettyPhoto.js
599 ms
flexslider.min.js
609 ms
isotope.min.js
598 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
599 ms
appear.js
616 ms
orbit.js
708 ms
init.js
676 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
677 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
607 ms
nectar-slider.js
646 ms
comment-reply.min.js
589 ms
nectar-love.js
660 ms
wp-embed.min.js
731 ms
Sage-logo1.png
1072 ms
sage-logo-2x.png
1072 ms
websize-1-of-1-3.jpg
1647 ms
websize-1-of-1-4.jpg
1279 ms
regino1-2.jpg
1148 ms
websize-1-of-1-3.jpg
1245 ms
websize-3-of-3-2.jpg
1231 ms
websize-1-of-1-2.jpg
1147 ms
Nancy4.jpg
1648 ms
ga.js
29 ms
websize-1-of-1.jpg
1540 ms
websize-1-of-3-2.jpg
1368 ms
websize-1-of-1-5.jpg
1384 ms
websize-1-of-1-6.jpg
1404 ms
sarah2-2.jpg
1523 ms
sean2.jpg
1524 ms
websize-1-of-11.jpg
1607 ms
81246310
107 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1644 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1628 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1640 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
1655 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1683 ms
icomoon.woff
1646 ms
websize-1-of-1-61.jpg
1716 ms
websize-1-of-1-2.jpg
1687 ms
player.js
181 ms
player.css
129 ms
ga.js
19 ms
vuid.min.js
125 ms
__utm.gif
60 ms
www.sagestringquartet.com
2150 ms
grid.png
723 ms
LA0C0957-Edit.jpg
960 ms
LA0C3708.jpg
1025 ms
IMG_1174.jpg
1169 ms
nectar-loading.gif
896 ms
diagonal_line.png
896 ms
jplayer.png
897 ms
81246310
43 ms
proxy.html
43 ms
457439110.jpg
220 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
6697891_60x60.jpg
88 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
144 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
86 ms
sagestringquartet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sagestringquartet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sagestringquartet.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sagestringquartet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sagestringquartet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sagestringquartet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sage String Quartet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: