6.9 sec in total
528 ms
4.7 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Sagif content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sagif.org
Visit sagif.orgWe analyzed Sagif.org page load time and found that the first response time was 528 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sagif.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
528 ms
1580 ms
524 ms
515 ms
529 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sagif.org, 87% (48 requests) were made to 7-unwto-gastronomy-tourism-forum.jp and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source 7-unwto-gastronomy-tourism-forum.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 208.9 kB (10%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Sagif.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sagif images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sagif.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 46% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (51%)
51
25
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sagif. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sagif.org
528 ms
7-unwto-gastronomy-tourism-forum.jp
1580 ms
style.min.css
524 ms
wpp.css
515 ms
normalize.css
529 ms
font-awesome.min.css
706 ms
font-awesome-animation.min.css
708 ms
style.css
542 ms
slick.css
684 ms
slick-theme.css
697 ms
css
32 ms
style.css
1572 ms
style.css
721 ms
st-rankcss.php
1056 ms
st-themecss-loader.php
906 ms
wpp.min.js
880 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
bookmark_button.js
19 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
715 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
735 ms
comment-reply.min.js
890 ms
slick.js
1110 ms
base.js
1096 ms
scroll.js
915 ms
st-copy-text.js
1059 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1508 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1091 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1231 ms
vimeo.min.js
1266 ms
0.gif
694 ms
bgt
1164 ms
0.gif
689 ms
st-themecss-loader.php
207 ms
unnamed-file-1.jpg
356 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E5%8F%A3%E3%82%B3%E3%83%9F%E3%82%84%E5%8A%B9%E6%9E%9C.jpg
366 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E5%8F%A3%E3%82%B3%E3%83%9F%E3%81%8C%E6%B0%97%E3%81%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B.jpg
723 ms
%E9%A1%94%E3%82%A2%E3%82%A4%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3.gif
177 ms
button_001.jpg
195 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E5%8F%A3%E3%82%B3%E3%83%9F.jpg
688 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E6%82%AA%E3%81%84%E5%8F%A3%E3%82%B3%E3%83%9F%E3%81%AB%E3%81%A4%E3%81%84%E3%81%A6.jpg
548 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E3%83%8D%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E3%81%AE%E5%8F%A3%E3%82%B3%E3%83%9F.jpg
384 ms
quote.png
528 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E5%8F%A3%E3%82%B3%E3%83%9F.jpg
546 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E5%8A%B9%E6%9E%9C%E3%82%92%E7%B4%B9%E4%BB%8B.jpg
562 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E3%83%A1%E3%83%AA%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%A8%E3%83%87%E3%83%A1%E3%83%AA%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AB%E3%81%A4%E3%81%84%E3%81%A6.jpg
705 ms
unnamed-file.jpg
724 ms
unnamed-file-4.jpg
726 ms
2%E9%80%B1%E9%96%93%E3%81%A7%E7%B5%82%E4%BA%86.jpg
740 ms
unnamed-file-3.jpg
1029 ms
unnamed-file-2.jpg
883 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AE%E4%BD%BF%E3%81%84%E6%96%B9%E3%81%AB%E3%81%A4%E3%81%84%E3%81%A6.jpg
1084 ms
%E3%82%AD%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E5%90%9B%E3%81%AF%E3%81%A9%E3%81%93%E3%81%A7%E5%A3%B2%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%82%8B.jpg
903 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
832 ms
stsvg.ttf
846 ms
mejs-controls.svg
932 ms
sagif.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sagif.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sagif.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sagif.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Sagif.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sagif.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sagif. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: