9.7 sec in total
182 ms
8.6 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Sail content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sail.org.uk
Whether you're new to sailing and fancy having a go, or an old salty sea dog looking for a new club, you'll hopefully find all the information you need.
Visit sail.org.ukWe analyzed Sail.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sail.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value36.2 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value2,430 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.104
89/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
182 ms
1608 ms
349 ms
341 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Sail.org.uk, 16% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Maps-api-ssl.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sail.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (11%)
9.5 MB
8.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sail.org.uk main page is 9.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 524.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 524.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 387.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sail.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (73%)
55
15
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sail.org.uk
182 ms
sail.org.uk
1608 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
349 ms
cli-style.css
341 ms
css
73 ms
css
82 ms
css
94 ms
style.css
520 ms
shortcodes.css
366 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
350 ms
default-calendar-grid.min.css
358 ms
default-calendar-list.min.css
880 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
656 ms
magnific_popup.css
1887 ms
wpgmza_style.css
1876 ms
jquery.js
2976 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2874 ms
cookielawinfo.js
2890 ms
gravitate_event_tracking.js
2901 ms
style.css
3682 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
3880 ms
comment-reply.min.js
3914 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
3894 ms
custom.js
3903 ms
smoothscroll.js
3921 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
4076 ms
default-calendar.min.js
4193 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
4801 ms
waypoints.min.js
4216 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
4904 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
4086 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
4915 ms
wp-embed.min.js
4940 ms
scripts.js
4923 ms
salvattore.min.js
4929 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
5113 ms
js
59 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
website-2015.png
2315 ms
IMG_4383.jpg
2500 ms
ThinkstockPhotos-486772230-1-400x250.jpg
2315 ms
imgID54467533.jpg-pwrt3-400x250.jpg
2315 ms
george-354x250.jpg
2381 ms
DSC_1069_fp2.jpg
2477 ms
10006044_691372800925197_6894126362405501513_o.jpg
2953 ms
rss.png
2638 ms
indian_background4.jpg
2900 ms
DSC_1069_fb.jpg
3241 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
2755 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
50 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
57 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
112 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
87 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
112 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
70 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
109 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
97 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
110 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
110 ms
bYbkq2nU2TSx4SwFbz5sCNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
111 ms
collect
28 ms
overlay.png
2750 ms
count.js
88 ms
ThinkstockPhotos-180549893.jpg
3625 ms
common.js
8 ms
map.js
19 ms
util.js
19 ms
marker.js
18 ms
onion.js
24 ms
sail.org.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sail.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sail.org.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sail.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sail.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sail.org.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: