Tools & Wizards About Us
salcom.be screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

salcom.be

SALCOM

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

327 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

140 ms

salcom.be screenshot

About Website

Welcome to salcom.be homepage info - get ready to check SALCOM best content right away, or after learning these important things about salcom.be

Visit salcom.be

Key Findings

We analyzed Salcom.be page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

salcom.be performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

salcom.be

327 ms

540 ms

style.css

101 ms

jquery.js

384 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

284 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Salcom.be, 4% (1 request) were made to Encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (758 ms) belongs to the original domain Salcom.be.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

571.4 kB

After Optimization

414.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Salcom.be main page is 571.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 388.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 224 B
  • After minification 217 B
  • After compression 178 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46 B or 21% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 388.2 kB
  • After minification 362.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SALCOM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 96.4 kB

  • Original 142.6 kB
  • After minification 141.8 kB
  • After compression 46.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 35.1 kB

  • Original 40.5 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Salcom.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SALCOM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

salcom.be

salcom.be

327 ms

540 ms

style.css

style.css

101 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

384 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

284 ms

dmsguestbook.css

dmsguestbook.css

284 ms

script.js

script.js

284 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

284 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

192 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

177 ms

images

images

81 ms

header.png

header.png

103 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

288 ms

blockcontent_b.png

blockcontent_b.png

103 ms

blockcontent_t.png

blockcontent_t.png

104 ms

blockcontent.png

blockcontent.png

106 ms

blockcontentbullets.png

blockcontentbullets.png

106 ms

post_b.png

post_b.png

198 ms

post_t.png

post_t.png

197 ms

post.png

post.png

200 ms

blockheader.png

blockheader.png

201 ms

search.png

search.png

203 ms

logotop-e1362603338395.png

logotop-e1362603338395.png

297 ms

footer_b.png

footer_b.png

571 ms

footer.png

footer.png

758 ms

Accessibility Review

salcom.be accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

salcom.be best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

salcom.be SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Salcom.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Salcom.be main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

salcom.be

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SALCOM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: