1.2 sec in total
141 ms
732 ms
371 ms
Visit salisburybrick.com now to see the best up-to-date Salisbury Brick content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about salisburybrick.com
Serving commercial and residential customers with quality masonry, hardscaping and fireplace supplies for the Eastern Shore of Maryland and beyond.
Visit salisburybrick.comWe analyzed Salisburybrick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
salisburybrick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value1,220 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
141 ms
64 ms
48 ms
41 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Salisburybrick.com, 16% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (284 ms) belongs to the original domain Salisburybrick.com.
Page size can be reduced by 187.6 kB (31%)
609.8 kB
422.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Salisburybrick.com main page is 609.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 387.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 178.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Salisbury Brick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (81%)
57
11
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Salisbury Brick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
salisburybrick.com
141 ms
gtm.js
64 ms
frontend.min.css
48 ms
css
41 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
134 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
69 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
140 ms
swiper.min.css
50 ms
post-320.css
134 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
103 ms
post-6.css
100 ms
frontend.css
103 ms
astra-addon-65ca6da7d845b8-05444304.css
142 ms
frontend.min.css
136 ms
post-1085.css
131 ms
css
43 ms
fontawesome.min.css
150 ms
solid.min.css
173 ms
js
69 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
148 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
211 ms
widget-call-to-action.min.css
159 ms
v2.js
41 ms
animations.min.css
156 ms
frontend.min.js
225 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
224 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
228 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
226 ms
dom-ready.min.js
225 ms
main.js
276 ms
astra-addon-65ca6da7d87305-65373826.js
227 ms
jquery.min.js
228 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
275 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
275 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
274 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
274 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
273 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
278 ms
hooks.min.js
275 ms
i18n.min.js
281 ms
frontend.min.js
276 ms
waypoints.min.js
274 ms
core.min.js
245 ms
frontend.min.js
284 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
223 ms
underscore.min.js
220 ms
wp-util.min.js
228 ms
frontend.min.js
202 ms
SB-logo-1_clipdrop-background-removal-350x140.png
123 ms
3-qg1jf2vls1igi65ghmjvpngj6os7zgkhr80cmgn8v4.jpeg
121 ms
4-qg1jf7ksq7ow47ymq6l0k49u5m521y35fv9s0uga00.jpg
120 ms
5-qg1jf6myjdnlslzzvo6dzmidk89ou8zf3qmajkho68.jpg
168 ms
products-hardscaping-qg1jf1xrl7h66k6tn45955p2lawurrgrf3cv56on1c.jpg
167 ms
who-we-are.jpg
182 ms
HLSG_Stacked_White-1024x647.png
167 ms
SB-logowhote.png
167 ms
HLSG_Logo_White.png
73 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
46 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
46 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
92 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
107 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
110 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
109 ms
font
110 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
107 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
107 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
105 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
108 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
110 ms
app.min.js
77 ms
salisburybrick.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
salisburybrick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
salisburybrick.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Salisburybrick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Salisburybrick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
salisburybrick.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Salisbury Brick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: