8.2 sec in total
2.1 sec
6 sec
114 ms
Visit salontextov.ru now to see the best up-to-date Salontextov content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about salontextov.ru
Контент для зрелого бизнеса. Сотрудничаем только с серьезными людьми с серьезными намерениями.
Visit salontextov.ruWe analyzed Salontextov.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
salontextov.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
2138 ms
25 ms
118 ms
37 ms
258 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Salontextov.ru, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Salontextov.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (55%)
2.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Salontextov.ru main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Salontextov images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 981.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 981.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 413.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Salontextov.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 413.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (84%)
62
10
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Salontextov. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.salontextov.ru
2138 ms
css
25 ms
layerslider.css
118 ms
css
37 ms
styles.css
258 ms
meteor-slides.css
507 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
409 ms
owl.theme.min.css
413 ms
style.min.css
435 ms
css
42 ms
style.css
404 ms
font-awesome.min.css
471 ms
stylesheet.min.css
784 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
603 ms
style_dynamic.css
505 ms
responsive.min.css
543 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
562 ms
js_composer.css
730 ms
custom_css.css
595 ms
style.css
650 ms
jquery.js
896 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
713 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
834 ms
greensock.js
837 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
816 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
854 ms
jquery.metadata.v2.js
875 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
928 ms
slideshow.js
1011 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1022 ms
scripts.js
1025 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1121 ms
ssba.min.js
1212 ms
qode-like.js
1098 ms
plugins.js
1771 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
1258 ms
lemmon-slider.js
1141 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
1203 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1243 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1154 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1218 ms
TweenLite.min.js
952 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
1197 ms
smoothPageScroll.js
1005 ms
default_dynamic.js
930 ms
default.min.js
1105 ms
custom_js.js
951 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1026 ms
js_composer_front.js
1231 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1057 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1046 ms
style.css
1021 ms
logo-st.png
138 ms
blank.gif
138 ms
rss.png
139 ms
do7-0avPC2vxor6SN2THGA.ttf
91 ms
ZKwULyCG95tk6mOqHQfRBC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
91 ms
cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
92 ms
rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
92 ms
STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
92 ms
WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
92 ms
QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
92 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
322 ms
watch.js
170 ms
skin.css
115 ms
logo.png
112 ms
watch.js
434 ms
skin.png
102 ms
man111.jpg
943 ms
advert.gif
101 ms
loading.gif
103 ms
1
86 ms
salontextov.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
salontextov.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
salontextov.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Salontextov.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Salontextov.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
salontextov.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Salontextov. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: