Tools & Wizards About Us
sancoat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

sancoat.com

Home - San Coat, Inc. - Quality Abrasive Blasting & Coating Services

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

240 ms

sancoat.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sancoat.com homepage info - get ready to check San Coat best content right away, or after learning these important things about sancoat.com

SanCoat Inc. was established forty years ago on the philosophy that doing the right thing is always the right thing. We apply this ideology to every detail of our business.

Visit sancoat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sancoat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sancoat.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sancoat.com

146 ms

sancoat.com

960 ms

style.min.css

5 ms

ethos.css

11 ms

jquery.min.js

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Sancoat.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (960 ms) belongs to the original domain Sancoat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.3 kB (14%)

Content Size

712.3 kB

After Optimization

609.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sancoat.com main page is 712.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 292.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 65.6 kB
  • After minification 64.4 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 292.9 kB
  • After minification 282.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. San Coat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 282.5 kB
  • After minification 282.5 kB
  • After compression 254.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 57.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sancoat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (56%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of San Coat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sancoat.com

sancoat.com

146 ms

sancoat.com

sancoat.com

960 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

5 ms

ethos.css

ethos.css

11 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

19 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

37 ms

css

css

64 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

30 ms

cs-classic.7.5.10.js

cs-classic.7.5.10.js

30 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

63 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

35 ms

x.js

x.js

62 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

58 ms

logo.png

logo.png

25 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

25 ms

SanCoat_29b-EFRPostCard_r3-2.jpg

SanCoat_29b-EFRPostCard_r3-2.jpg

62 ms

Home_Section2.jpg

Home_Section2.jpg

61 ms

logo_for_black.png

logo_for_black.png

25 ms

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7p4HM-M.ttf

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7p4HM-M.ttf

24 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pa8FvOreeI.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pa8FvOreeI.ttf

29 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

37 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

14 ms

Accessibility Review

sancoat.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

sancoat.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sancoat.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sancoat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sancoat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sancoat.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of San Coat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: