1.1 sec in total
117 ms
688 ms
310 ms
Visit sanderling.com now to see the best up-to-date Sanderling content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sanderling.com
Sanderling has supported over 90 biomedical companies earning consistently high rates of return on its venture investments.
Visit sanderling.comWe analyzed Sanderling.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 998 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
sanderling.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value4.7 s
70/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
117 ms
126 ms
31 ms
45 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Sanderling.com, 81% (58 requests) were made to 17dxz634tcba1yaiqj33jt8t.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (208 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (58%)
2.1 MB
899.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Sanderling.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sanderling needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 60% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 77.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 77.1 kB or 38% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sanderling.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (17%)
63
52
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sanderling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sanderling.com
117 ms
www.sanderling.com
126 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
31 ms
style.min.css
45 ms
flickity-docs.css
41 ms
theme.css
48 ms
modernizr.min.js
58 ms
jquery.min.js
58 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
31 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
57 ms
isotope.min.js
56 ms
bundle.js
65 ms
font-awesome.min.css
21 ms
css
24 ms
analytics.js
208 ms
logo.png
165 ms
slideshow2.jpg
78 ms
slideshow3.jpg
78 ms
sotera.jpg
61 ms
Actimis1.png
59 ms
Aderis.png
56 ms
Advanced.png
56 ms
Altor_BioScience1.png
65 ms
Artielle1.png
62 ms
Asteres-1.png
70 ms
BioSpace.png
71 ms
CalciMedica.png
76 ms
CardioNet.png
76 ms
Chimerix.png
139 ms
Cylene.png
144 ms
DalCor_logo.png
145 ms
Dendrion.png
144 ms
DepoTech.png
145 ms
Digirad.png
145 ms
Dynavax.png
142 ms
endocyte.png
151 ms
GeminX_v2.png
150 ms
glycomine.png
149 ms
infaredx.png
146 ms
InterMune.png
149 ms
Ista.png
145 ms
Kadmus.png
150 ms
lineagen.png
152 ms
Liphorus-copy.png
155 ms
metavention.png
152 ms
Naviscan.png
154 ms
Neomend.png
153 ms
Pacira.png
155 ms
PreciThera.png
157 ms
PulsarVascular.png
157 ms
Regeneron1.png
159 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
60 ms
wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJXsCxGDNNV.ttf
60 ms
wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJX1C1GDNNV.ttf
60 ms
wlp2gwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfbwhW.ttf
62 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
130 ms
Sotera.png
113 ms
Stentor.png
111 ms
Stereotaxis.png
112 ms
Taligen.png
112 ms
TherAvida.png
109 ms
Theregen.png
112 ms
Torax.png
102 ms
UltraBridge.png
104 ms
Ventritex.png
104 ms
ViaCyte.png
101 ms
Vical.png
101 ms
Xoma.png
101 ms
logo-footer.png
52 ms
therillia_logo.png
48 ms
sanderling.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
sanderling.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sanderling.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sanderling.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sanderling.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sanderling.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sanderling. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: