852 ms in total
40 ms
592 ms
220 ms
Click here to check amazing Sand Hill content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sandhill.com
Business Strategy for Software, Cloud and Mobile.
Visit sandhill.comWe analyzed Sandhill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 812 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
sandhill.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value1,030 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value6.9 s
53/100
10%
40 ms
12 ms
76 ms
15 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Sandhill.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (225 ms) belongs to the original domain Sandhill.com.
Page size can be reduced by 183.3 kB (44%)
414.7 kB
231.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Sandhill.com main page is 414.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 191.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sand Hill needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 96.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.8 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sandhill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (31%)
52
36
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sand Hill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sandhill.com
40 ms
style.css
12 ms
anywhere.js
76 ms
jquery.js
15 ms
save-pre.js
17 ms
show.php
39 ms
jsapi
38 ms
default.css
47 ms
show.php
101 ms
show.php
99 ms
show.php
99 ms
show.php
97 ms
show.php
101 ms
show.php
138 ms
show.php
138 ms
jquery.min.js
142 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
137 ms
jquery.ThreeDots.min.js
9 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
94 ms
scripts.js
9 ms
jquery.cookie.js
32 ms
reset.css
8 ms
ga.js
80 ms
default.css
96 ms
show_i.php
62 ms
49 ms
logo.png
52 ms
blank.gif
46 ms
sprite-ui.png
50 ms
topicbigdata.jpg
51 ms
shreyanshsurana.jpg
225 ms
carolbroadbent.jpg
53 ms
dougmagyari.jpg
52 ms
sh-homepage-venturedeal.png
54 ms
kathleengoolsby.jpg
58 ms
ganeskesari.jpg
60 ms
deirdremahon.jpg
60 ms
howarddresner.jpg
58 ms
todddelaughter.jpg
60 ms
amitabhsinha.jpg
61 ms
sekharsarukkai.jpg
64 ms
spinner_small_white.gif
61 ms
rss_icon.png
62 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
default+en.css
19 ms
default+en.I.js
24 ms
twitter.png
69 ms
search.png
70 ms
6-1-1316198154.png
70 ms
51-1-1427591352.png
69 ms
common-bullet.png
71 ms
67-1-1403141175.jpg
70 ms
async-ads.js
80 ms
small-logo.png
28 ms
sandhill.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sandhill.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sandhill.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sandhill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sandhill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sandhill.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sand Hill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: