Tools & Wizards About Us
sandiegofamilylawyer.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

Top Rated Attorneys | Family Lawyer San Diego CA | Reliable Law Firm

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

410 ms

sandiegofamilylawyer.org screenshot

About Website

Visit sandiegofamilylawyer.org now to see the best up-to-date San Diego Family Lawyer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sandiegofamilylawyer.org

Whether you are wanting a divorce, dissolving a civil union, or seeking benefits in a domestic partnership, choose our highly experienced & certified San Diego Family Lawyer, an expert in family law.

Visit sandiegofamilylawyer.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Sandiegofamilylawyer.org page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sandiegofamilylawyer.org performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value3.039

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

174 ms

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

442 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

style.min.css

165 ms

styles.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Sandiegofamilylawyer.org, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) belongs to the original domain Sandiegofamilylawyer.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.6 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

937.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sandiegofamilylawyer.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 630.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 72.7 kB

  • Original 87.5 kB
  • After minification 75.3 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 630.4 kB
  • After minification 615.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. San Diego Family Lawyer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 174.7 kB
  • After minification 174.7 kB
  • After compression 136.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 54.9 kB

  • Original 225.0 kB
  • After minification 225.0 kB
  • After compression 170.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sandiegofamilylawyer.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.9 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (86%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of San Diego Family Lawyer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

174 ms

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

442 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

165 ms

styles.css

styles.css

241 ms

stmicons.css

stmicons.css

243 ms

stmicons.css

stmicons.css

244 ms

stmicons.css

stmicons.css

247 ms

stmicons.css

stmicons.css

249 ms

stmicons.css

stmicons.css

251 ms

stmicons.css

stmicons.css

321 ms

stmicons.css

stmicons.css

324 ms

megamenu.css

megamenu.css

326 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

495 ms

css

css

31 ms

app.css

app.css

413 ms

skin-custom.css

skin-custom.css

426 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

402 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

404 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

489 ms

style_2.css

style_2.css

482 ms

style_3.css

style_3.css

485 ms

style_2.css

style_2.css

493 ms

style_2.css

style_2.css

510 ms

style_2.css

style_2.css

562 ms

style_2.css

style_2.css

566 ms

style_3.css

style_3.css

570 ms

style_3.css

style_3.css

579 ms

bootstrap-datepicker3.css

bootstrap-datepicker3.css

642 ms

style_3.css

style_3.css

646 ms

style_1.css

style_1.css

651 ms

style_3.css

style_3.css

652 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

661 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

668 ms

megamenu.js

megamenu.js

722 ms

style_1.css

style_1.css

800 ms

stm_slider.css

stm_slider.css

800 ms

style_1.css

style_1.css

722 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

640 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

567 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

656 ms

style_3.css

style_3.css

654 ms

style_1.css

style_1.css

652 ms

datepicker.css

datepicker.css

651 ms

datepicker.css

datepicker.css

716 ms

jquery.timepicker.css

jquery.timepicker.css

647 ms

timepicker.css

timepicker.css

644 ms

style_1.css

style_1.css

639 ms

style_1.css

style_1.css

564 ms

style_3.css

style_3.css

562 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

617 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

612 ms

index.js

index.js

560 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

556 ms

SmoothScroll.js

SmoothScroll.js

549 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

548 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.en_US.js

bootstrap-datepicker.en_US.js

599 ms

sticky-kit.js

sticky-kit.js

599 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

547 ms

app.js

app.js

543 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

544 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

541 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

614 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

609 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

549 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

548 ms

jquery.timepicker.js

jquery.timepicker.js

543 ms

payment.png

payment.png

457 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

546 ms

banner1-2-1920x800.jpg

banner1-2-1920x800.jpg

693 ms

banner3-1920x800.jpg

banner3-1920x800.jpg

647 ms

banner2-1920x800.jpg

banner2-1920x800.jpg

723 ms

best-lawyer-1.jpg

best-lawyer-1.jpg

480 ms

about-attorney.jpg

about-attorney.jpg

554 ms

legal-advice.jpg

legal-advice.jpg

546 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf

172 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf

173 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf

217 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf

236 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf

237 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf

237 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf

237 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgzaGW8.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgzaGW8.ttf

236 ms

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0j.ttf

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0j.ttf

234 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8zaGW8.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8zaGW8.ttf

237 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

644 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

535 ms

stmicons.ttf

stmicons.ttf

554 ms

stmicons.ttf

stmicons.ttf

614 ms

stmicons.ttf

stmicons.ttf

563 ms

stmicons.ttf

stmicons.ttf

562 ms

stmicons.ttf

stmicons.ttf

563 ms

stmicons.ttf

stmicons.ttf

563 ms

stmicons.ttf

stmicons.ttf

630 ms

Accessibility Review

sandiegofamilylawyer.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

sandiegofamilylawyer.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sandiegofamilylawyer.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sandiegofamilylawyer.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sandiegofamilylawyer.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sandiegofamilylawyer.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of San Diego Family Lawyer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: