Tools & Wizards About Us
sandiegoimaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

sandiegoimaging.com

San Diego Imaging - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

175 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

152 ms

sandiegoimaging.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sandiegoimaging.com homepage info - get ready to check San Diego Imaging best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sandiegoimaging.com

Providing Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology services to the San Diego community for over 40 years.

Visit sandiegoimaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sandiegoimaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sandiegoimaging.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,860 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.102

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sandiegoimaging.com

175 ms

www.sdimaging.com

313 ms

style.css

138 ms

flaticon.css

142 ms

style.css

142 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sandiegoimaging.com, 84% (81 requests) were made to Aaeeb8.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) relates to the external source Sdimaging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.3 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sandiegoimaging.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 566.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 43.5 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 405.3 kB
  • After minification 405.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. San Diego Imaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 566.0 kB
  • After minification 566.0 kB
  • After compression 556.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 177.5 kB
  • After minification 177.4 kB
  • After compression 158.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sandiegoimaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (93%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of San Diego Imaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sandiegoimaging.com

sandiegoimaging.com

175 ms

www.sdimaging.com

www.sdimaging.com

313 ms

style.css

style.css

138 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

142 ms

style.css

style.css

142 ms

style.css

style.css

146 ms

style.css

style.css

144 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

149 ms

styles.css

styles.css

162 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

153 ms

style.css

style.css

158 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

159 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

162 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

163 ms

js_composer.css

js_composer.css

176 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

173 ms

master.css

master.css

174 ms

isotope.css

isotope.css

203 ms

shop.css

shop.css

203 ms

dynamic-styles.php

dynamic-styles.php

62 ms

switcher.css

switcher.css

207 ms

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

205 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

213 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

212 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

213 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

212 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

AC_RunActiveContent.js

212 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

211 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

229 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

226 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

228 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

227 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

225 ms

index.js

index.js

229 ms

index.js

index.js

239 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

238 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

242 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

239 ms

api.js

api.js

66 ms

cssua.min.js

cssua.min.js

113 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

111 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

117 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

121 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

117 ms

jquery.easypiechart.js

jquery.easypiechart.js

114 ms

ios-orientationchange-fix.js

ios-orientationchange-fix.js

110 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

123 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

113 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

116 ms

bootstrap-select.js

bootstrap-select.js

119 ms

evol.colorpicker.min.js

evol.colorpicker.min.js

115 ms

css

css

57 ms

isotope.css

isotope.css

109 ms

validation-2.2.min.css

validation-2.2.min.css

88 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

89 ms

jquery.nouislider.css

jquery.nouislider.css

88 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

90 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

95 ms

main.css

main.css

97 ms

yamm.css

yamm.css

96 ms

loader.css

loader.css

89 ms

jquery.datetimepicker.css

jquery.datetimepicker.css

93 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

94 ms

theme-GlobalUI.css

theme-GlobalUI.css

105 ms

theme.css

theme.css

102 ms

theme-Cosmetic.css

theme-Cosmetic.css

106 ms

custom.css

custom.css

89 ms

inner.css

inner.css

98 ms

shop.css

shop.css

91 ms

blog.css

blog.css

103 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

101 ms

animate.css

animate.css

103 ms

color.css

color.css

94 ms

debugging.css

debugging.css

98 ms

dmss.js

dmss.js

263 ms

jflickrfeed.min.js

jflickrfeed.min.js

261 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

259 ms

index.js

index.js

260 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

253 ms

SDi_logo_290x88.png

SDi_logo_290x88.png

78 ms

calendar.png

calendar.png

77 ms

home-new.jpeg

home-new.jpeg

182 ms

decor-brand.png

decor-brand.png

75 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

52 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

54 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

103 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

117 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

118 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

118 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

118 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

119 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

117 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

101 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

101 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

135 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

65 ms

Accessibility Review

sandiegoimaging.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sandiegoimaging.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sandiegoimaging.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sandiegoimaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sandiegoimaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sandiegoimaging.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of San Diego Imaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: