2.8 sec in total
33 ms
2.4 sec
313 ms
Click here to check amazing Sandpoint Reader content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sandpointreader.com
Sandpoint Reader is an alternative weekly newspaper, featuring culture, arts, entertainment, news and opinion for Sandpoint and northern Idaho.
Visit sandpointreader.comWe analyzed Sandpointreader.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
sandpointreader.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
33 ms
1110 ms
33 ms
49 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Sandpointreader.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sandpointreader.com.
Page size can be reduced by 798.2 kB (17%)
4.8 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Sandpointreader.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 489.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sandpoint Reader needs image optimization as it can save up to 489.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 255.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 255.9 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 139 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sandpointreader.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (63%)
81
30
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sandpoint Reader. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sandpointreader.com
33 ms
sandpointreader.com
1110 ms
css
33 ms
css
49 ms
dashicons.min.css
16 ms
wunderground.css
27 ms
styles.css
24 ms
awesome-weather.css
31 ms
css
82 ms
cff-style.css
28 ms
font-awesome.min.css
30 ms
templates.css
38 ms
style.css
31 ms
style.css
34 ms
responsive.css
45 ms
font-awesome.min.css
39 ms
awp-columns.css
39 ms
addtoany.min.css
42 ms
wp-featherlight.min.css
44 ms
jquery.js
166 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
164 ms
core.min.js
170 ms
widget.min.js
180 ms
position.min.js
182 ms
menu.min.js
180 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
302 ms
autocomplete.min.js
294 ms
widget.min.js
296 ms
addtoany.min.js
311 ms
sam-layout.min.js
316 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
312 ms
init.js
423 ms
cff-scripts.js
432 ms
blankshield.min.js
440 ms
block-tabnapping.js
450 ms
rss.js
448 ms
scripts.js
449 ms
new-tab.min.js
620 ms
wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js
620 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
620 ms
maxmegamenu.js
497 ms
wp-embed.min.js
620 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
553 ms
style.css
435 ms
page.js
140 ms
analytics.js
139 ms
2ZcmwY9_IQQ
222 ms
Reader600px.jpg
77 ms
s-right-s2.png
213 ms
BTAA-dog-WEB-feature-720x340.jpg
470 ms
FreeClassifiedAllNew.gif
209 ms
Screenshot-2024-08-28-at-7.26.50%E2%80%AFPM.png
155 ms
Screen-Shot-2022-11-10-at-7.09.30-AM.png
157 ms
Screen-Shot-2021-11-08-at-9.57.52-AM.png
156 ms
Redoubtcover_2017.jpg
169 ms
Cover_RubyRidgestandoff-1.jpg
171 ms
Sandpoint-MediaSurvey2018-225px.jpg
472 ms
Reader-AdvertiseHere.jpg
176 ms
StudioTour_300x189-300x189.jpg
177 ms
Sandpoint-Reader-Tin-Roof-Design-Studio-300x250.jpg
182 ms
DannHall-MiniDoc-300x167.png
188 ms
LanaYoung-ad-March30-proof-v2.jpg
195 ms
badge.svg
199 ms
titillium-light-webfont.svg
401 ms
titillium-regular-webfont.svg
401 ms
titillium-semibold-webfont.svg
401 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
86 ms
AAABVuGyrgAA
5 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
437 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
51 ms
sam-ajax.php
600 ms
sam-ajax.php
617 ms
api.json
369 ms
sm.25.html
28 ms
eso.D0Uc7kY6.js
46 ms
collect
21 ms
js
68 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
23 ms
base.js
56 ms
ad_status.js
137 ms
UCY5Klx_0fJhMytIltuKLUwnjJON9GWedkq6jjIrpW0.js
112 ms
embed.js
57 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
13 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
18 ms
titillium-light-webfont.woff
186 ms
titillium-regular-webfont.woff
106 ms
titillium-semibold-webfont.woff
187 ms
id
14 ms
Create
74 ms
GenerateIT
14 ms
print.css
22 ms
sandpointreader.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
sandpointreader.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sandpointreader.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sandpointreader.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sandpointreader.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sandpointreader.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sandpoint Reader. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: