Tools & Wizards About Us
santeo.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

santeo.net

Mutuelle et Assurance Santé. Devis et Tarifs Comparatifs Mutuelle

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

290 ms

Resources Loaded

826 ms

Page Rendered

117 ms

santeo.net screenshot

About Website

Visit santeo.net now to see the best up-to-date Santeo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about santeo.net

Votre mutuelle santé trop chère ? Comparez votre mutuelle santé avec Santeo, spécialiste de l'assurance santé depuis 1992, et bénéficiez d'offres exclusives avec nos partenaires assureurs et m...

Visit santeo.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Santeo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 943 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

santeo.net performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

santeo.net

290 ms

css

44 ms

style.css

111 ms

feather.min.js

50 ms

logo.jpg

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Santeo.net, 14% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (399 ms) belongs to the original domain Santeo.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.3 kB (15%)

Content Size

93.3 kB

After Optimization

79.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Santeo.net main page is 93.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 80.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 12.4 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 80.0 kB
  • After minification 75.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Santeo images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Santeo. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

santeo.net

santeo.net

290 ms

css

css

44 ms

style.css

style.css

111 ms

feather.min.js

feather.min.js

50 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

199 ms

banner70.png

banner70.png

399 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

16 ms

Accessibility Review

santeo.net accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

santeo.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

santeo.net SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Santeo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Santeo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

santeo.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Santeo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: