Tools & Wizards About Us
sarathi.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

sarathi.com

Sarathi International Inc – Incense for the Soul

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

352 ms

sarathi.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sarathi.com homepage info - get ready to check Sarathi best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about sarathi.com

Visit sarathi.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sarathi.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sarathi.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.124

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sarathi.com

1132 ms

style.min.css

403 ms

styles.css

579 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

580 ms

grid-system.css

602 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Sarathi.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sarathi.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (84%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

529.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sarathi.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 74.3 kB

  • Original 89.5 kB
  • After minification 87.9 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 2.7 MB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 163.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sarathi needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 MB or 94% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 216.0 kB
  • After minification 216.0 kB
  • After compression 214.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 137.2 kB
  • After minification 137.2 kB
  • After compression 135.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sarathi.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (69%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sarathi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sarathi.com

sarathi.com

1132 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

403 ms

styles.css

styles.css

579 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

580 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

602 ms

style.css

style.css

607 ms

element-testimonial.css

element-testimonial.css

625 ms

element-fancy-box.css

element-fancy-box.css

639 ms

element-team-member.css

element-team-member.css

771 ms

element-video-lightbox.css

element-video-lightbox.css

773 ms

element-fancy-unordered-list.css

element-fancy-unordered-list.css

800 ms

owl-carousel.css

owl-carousel.css

806 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

834 ms

flickity.css

flickity.css

852 ms

skin-material.css

skin-material.css

964 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

961 ms

widget-nectar-posts.css

widget-nectar-posts.css

999 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1007 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

1254 ms

css

css

31 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1279 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1152 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

963 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

1006 ms

core.css

core.css

1015 ms

slide-out-right-material.css

slide-out-right-material.css

1218 ms

index.js

index.js

1231 ms

index.js

index.js

1231 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

1231 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

1285 ms

priority.js

priority.js

1311 ms

intersection-observer.min.js

intersection-observer.min.js

1345 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

1345 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

1404 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

1413 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

1481 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

1514 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1537 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

1328 ms

flickity.min.js

flickity.min.js

1428 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

1230 ms

init.js

init.js

1505 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

1312 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1302 ms

sarathi-logo-right1.png

sarathi-logo-right1.png

822 ms

sarathi-logo-left.png

sarathi-logo-left.png

713 ms

1985-86_Certificate_of_Merit.png

1985-86_Certificate_of_Merit.png

1478 ms

sarathi-int-slide-01.png

sarathi-int-slide-01.png

1588 ms

1987-88_Certificate_of_Merit-1.png

1987-88_Certificate_of_Merit-1.png

1306 ms

1993-94_Second_Export_Award.png

1993-94_Second_Export_Award.png

1512 ms

1995-96_State_Award-1.png

1995-96_State_Award-1.png

1224 ms

1996-2000_State_Award-1.png

1996-2000_State_Award-1.png

1396 ms

1996-2000_State_Award1.png

1996-2000_State_Award1.png

1640 ms

1999-2000_Certificate_of_Merit-1.png

1999-2000_Certificate_of_Merit-1.png

1704 ms

2000-2001_Second_Export_Award.png

2000-2001_Second_Export_Award.png

1588 ms

2001-2002_Certificate_of_Merit.png

2001-2002_Certificate_of_Merit.png

1903 ms

2001-2002_gold-award.png

2001-2002_gold-award.png

1918 ms

2003-2004_state-award-gold.png

2003-2004_state-award-gold.png

1780 ms

2003-2004-_certificate_of_merit.png

2003-2004-_certificate_of_merit.png

1780 ms

sarathi-slider-1.jpg

sarathi-slider-1.jpg

1834 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

41 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

54 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7alwQ.woff

55 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkW-EH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkW-EH7alwQ.woff

53 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

54 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

1776 ms

OpenSans-Regular.woff

OpenSans-Regular.woff

1839 ms

OpenSans-Light.woff

OpenSans-Light.woff

1854 ms

OpenSans-SemiBold.woff

OpenSans-SemiBold.woff

1925 ms

OpenSans-Bold.woff

OpenSans-Bold.woff

1983 ms

Accessibility Review

sarathi.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sarathi.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sarathi.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sarathi.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sarathi.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sarathi.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sarathi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: