Tools & Wizards About Us
sarem.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

sarem.com

Home | Sarem Machinery - Plastic Pipe Extrusion Lines

Page Load Speed

11.8 sec in total

First Response

559 ms

Resources Loaded

7.7 sec

Page Rendered

3.6 sec

sarem.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sarem content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sarem.com

We manufacture Machinery production for PP, PE, PPR-C, Corrugated, Drip Irrigation Pipe Extrusion lines & Injection Molds for fittings.

Visit sarem.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sarem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sarem.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,880 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.184

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

559 ms

3094 ms

js

98 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

171 ms

bdt-uikit.css

326 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Sarem.com, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Sarem.com.tr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 421.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

13.8 MB

After Optimization

13.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sarem.com main page is 13.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 88.2 kB

  • Original 106.7 kB
  • After minification 97.3 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 316.0 kB

  • Original 12.9 MB
  • After minification 12.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sarem images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 507.1 kB
  • After minification 506.9 kB
  • After compression 502.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 296.0 kB
  • After minification 296.0 kB
  • After compression 283.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sarem.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (86%)

Requests Now

94

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sarem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

559 ms

3094 ms

js

js

98 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

171 ms

bdt-uikit.css

bdt-uikit.css

326 ms

element-pack-site.css

element-pack-site.css

406 ms

premium-addons.min.css

premium-addons.min.css

553 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

432 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

438 ms

eae.min.css

eae.min.css

582 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

470 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

542 ms

vegas.min.css

vegas.min.css

568 ms

styles.css

styles.css

580 ms

htbbootstrap.css

htbbootstrap.css

615 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

676 ms

animation.css

animation.css

687 ms

htmega-keyframes.css

htmega-keyframes.css

700 ms

base.css

base.css

853 ms

auxin-icon.css

auxin-icon.css

725 ms

main.css

main.css

1025 ms

default.css

default.css

830 ms

tablepress-responsive.min.css

tablepress-responsive.min.css

839 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

843 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

870 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

967 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

976 ms

post-4208.css

post-4208.css

977 ms

elementor.css

elementor.css

988 ms

elementor-widgets.css

elementor-widgets.css

1016 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

1112 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

1120 ms

global.css

global.css

1116 ms

post-2894.css

post-2894.css

1123 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1165 ms

go-pricing.css

go-pricing.css

1167 ms

post-4209.css

post-4209.css

1241 ms

post-5602.css

post-5602.css

1250 ms

css

css

51 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

1253 ms

element-pack-font.css

element-pack-font.css

1117 ms

ep-slider.css

ep-slider.css

987 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

910 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

956 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

967 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

943 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

871 ms

modernizr-custom.min.js

modernizr-custom.min.js

896 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

996 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1038 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1029 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

1357 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

940 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

971 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

1090 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

933 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

834 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

901 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

938 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

933 ms

pro-tools.js

pro-tools.js

938 ms

eae.min.js

eae.min.js

887 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

921 ms

animated-main.min.js

animated-main.min.js

953 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

938 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

925 ms

vegas.min.js

vegas.min.js

951 ms

index.js

index.js

924 ms

index.js

index.js

936 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

955 ms

htbbootstrap.js

htbbootstrap.js

955 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

940 ms

custom.js

custom.js

964 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

930 ms

bdt-uikit.min.js

bdt-uikit.min.js

958 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

951 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

951 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

932 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

962 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

924 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

943 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

953 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

946 ms

element-pack-site.min.js

element-pack-site.min.js

821 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

803 ms

SAREM-LOGO.png

SAREM-LOGO.png

870 ms

kmd2202_HG_Kopfgrafiken_1600x192px-3-1.png

kmd2202_HG_Kopfgrafiken_1600x192px-3-1.png

1252 ms

Carousel-Section-1.jpg

Carousel-Section-1.jpg

1634 ms

Carousel-Section-2.jpg

Carousel-Section-2.jpg

1529 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

19 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

57 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

80 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

83 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

83 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

81 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

81 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

81 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

83 ms

auxin-front.woff

auxin-front.woff

987 ms

Carousel-Section-3.jpg

Carousel-Section-3.jpg

1823 ms

Basliksiz-3.png

Basliksiz-3.png

1678 ms

SARICI-300x300.jpg

SARICI-300x300.jpg

1004 ms

MUF-300x300.jpg

MUF-300x300.jpg

1147 ms

KORUGE-300x300.jpg

KORUGE-300x300.jpg

1208 ms

KES%C4%B0C%C4%B0-300x300.jpg

KES%C4%B0C%C4%B0-300x300.jpg

1267 ms

EKSTR%C3%9CDER-300x300.jpg

EKSTR%C3%9CDER-300x300.jpg

1274 ms

Accessibility Review

sarem.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sarem.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sarem.com SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sarem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sarem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sarem.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sarem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: