8.8 sec in total
2.7 sec
5.5 sec
531 ms
Visit saxil.de now to see the best up-to-date Saxil content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about saxil.de
Die SAXIL-WERK GmbH entwickelt und produziert textile Filter und textile Filterelemente zur Anwendung in den unterschiedlichsten Einsatzgebieten.
Visit saxil.deWe analyzed Saxil.de page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
saxil.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value800 ms
37/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
2707 ms
234 ms
250 ms
24 ms
373 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Saxil.de, 15% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Saxil.de.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (44%)
5.6 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Saxil.de main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Saxil images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 954.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saxil.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 954.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (67%)
52
17
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Saxil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
saxil.de
2707 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
234 ms
layerslider.css
250 ms
css
24 ms
theme-styles.min.css
373 ms
pe-line-icons.min.css
280 ms
font-awesome.min.css
391 ms
icomoon-fonts.min.css
395 ms
theme-icons.min.css
367 ms
css
36 ms
style.css
384 ms
custom.css
409 ms
js_composer.css
631 ms
greensock.js
621 ms
jquery.js
754 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
522 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
656 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
539 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
6 ms
UA-71412518-1.js
107 ms
js
23 ms
comment-reply.min.js
565 ms
core.min.js
585 ms
widget.min.js
672 ms
tabs.min.js
673 ms
scripts-vendors.js
1399 ms
smoothscroll.js
741 ms
jquerytransit.js
720 ms
js_composer_front.js
811 ms
theme-styles.min-blessed1.css
676 ms
logo_3.png
512 ms
hintergrund_5.jpg
604 ms
Gesamtaufnahme-38809_var1_RGB.png
512 ms
2012_09_07_Saxil_009_2.png
1332 ms
2012_09_17_Saxil_010_2.png
1222 ms
messschieber1.png
600 ms
Monitor.png
740 ms
entw%C3%BCrfe1.png
735 ms
zirkel1.png
732 ms
Kay-Kupfer-05-Kopie-mi7s40ci03cngnijf6wx47cfqv3n1bzbpjux4i5544.jpg
1090 ms
Schwei%C3%9Fer-mi7s3ygr6pqwz7anwkepcdmtmya9439z25v3y0uej0.jpg
979 ms
B-Produktionsbild-Silo_1-mi7s3ygr6pqwz7anwkepcdmtmya9439z25v3y0uej0.jpg
1220 ms
captcha.php
879 ms
video-mask.png
998 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
59 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
61 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
59 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
60 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
59 ms
vDvcuXwZxUMLuTfuLrSLpA.ttf
59 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
58 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
59 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
60 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
58 ms
fonts-icomoon.woff
1318 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1244 ms
theme-icons.woff
1121 ms
Bild-1-Gr%C3%BCnde.jpg
1280 ms
skin.css
914 ms
common.js
7 ms
map.js
24 ms
util.js
23 ms
marker.js
22 ms
onion.js
33 ms
stats.js
22 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
88 ms
controls.js
80 ms
saxil.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
saxil.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
saxil.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saxil.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saxil.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
saxil.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Saxil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: