Tools & Wizards About Us
scaiff.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

scaiff.co.uk

Solicitors in Worcester : Solicitors in Worcestershire : Scaiff LLP

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

scaiff.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to scaiff.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Scaiff best content right away, or after learning these important things about scaiff.co.uk

Based in central Worcester, minutes from the law courts, Scaiff LLP is a well established firm of solicitors, with partners specialising in all aspects of the law particularly commercial, conveyancing...

Visit scaiff.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Scaiff.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scaiff.co.uk performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scaiff.co.uk

193 ms

552 ms

df_lib_styles.css

160 ms

df-builder-styles.css

226 ms

popup-custom.css

229 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Scaiff.co.uk, 80% (74 requests) were made to Talbotslaw.co.uk and 9% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.yoshki.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (924 ms) relates to the external source Talbotslaw.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 511.4 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scaiff.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 440.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 295.8 kB

  • Original 347.6 kB
  • After minification 344.0 kB
  • After compression 51.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 295.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 70.7 kB

  • Original 375.6 kB
  • After minification 304.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scaiff needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 59.2 kB

  • Original 440.2 kB
  • After minification 440.2 kB
  • After compression 381.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 85.8 kB

  • Original 362.8 kB
  • After minification 362.7 kB
  • After compression 277.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scaiff.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (85%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scaiff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

scaiff.co.uk

scaiff.co.uk

193 ms

552 ms

df_lib_styles.css

df_lib_styles.css

160 ms

df-builder-styles.css

df-builder-styles.css

226 ms

popup-custom.css

popup-custom.css

229 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

234 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

239 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

161 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

218 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

300 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

228 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

278 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

321 ms

all.css

all.css

131 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

367 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

311 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

336 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

377 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

390 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

404 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

400 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

401 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

441 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

453 ms

popup.css

popup.css

465 ms

animate.css

animate.css

480 ms

readmore.css

readmore.css

484 ms

carousel.min.css

carousel.min.css

485 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

160 ms

csshero-static-style-divi.css

csshero-static-style-divi.css

514 ms

main.css

main.css

528 ms

main-media-query.css

main-media-query.css

543 ms

animations.css

animations.css

558 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

639 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

571 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

590 ms

popper-1.16.1.min.js

popper-1.16.1.min.js

605 ms

tippy-5.2.1.min.js

tippy-5.2.1.min.js

698 ms

js

js

57 ms

et-core-unified-987500288.min.css

et-core-unified-987500288.min.css

650 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

581 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

529 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

541 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

576 ms

divi-filter-loadmore.min.js

divi-filter-loadmore.min.js

565 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

635 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

625 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

577 ms

df-menu-ext-script.js

df-menu-ext-script.js

573 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

609 ms

fitvids.js

fitvids.js

542 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

520 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

520 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

519 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

547 ms

main.js

main.js

538 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

517 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

646 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

660 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

625 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

613 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

600 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

582 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

581 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

731 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

701 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

686 ms

wp-ajax-response.min.js

wp-ajax-response.min.js

672 ms

google-analytics.min.js

google-analytics.min.js

643 ms

common.js

common.js

642 ms

carousel.min.js

carousel.min.js

708 ms

frontend-general.min.js

frontend-general.min.js

692 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

639 ms

sticky-elements.js

sticky-elements.js

712 ms

talbots-logo-300x96.png

talbots-logo-300x96.png

606 ms

Scaiff-Acquisition-L-850x560-1.jpg

Scaiff-Acquisition-L-850x560-1.jpg

924 ms

talbots-logo-300x96-1.png

talbots-logo-300x96-1.png

529 ms

dream-home.jpg

dream-home.jpg

780 ms

Hero-swoosh-2.png

Hero-swoosh-2.png

779 ms

55845r.html

55845r.html

161 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-7574-tb-370907-987500288-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-7574-tb-370907-987500288-late.css

329 ms

strawford-regular-webfont.ttf

strawford-regular-webfont.ttf

718 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

640 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

79 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

10 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

103 ms

yoshki-library.js

yoshki-library.js

13 ms

Default.png

Default.png

4 ms

_Default.png

_Default.png

3 ms

-Default.png

-Default.png

10 ms

=Default.png

=Default.png

11 ms

1px.gif

1px.gif

11 ms

livechat.ashx

livechat.ashx

284 ms

Accessibility Review

scaiff.co.uk accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

scaiff.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

scaiff.co.uk SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scaiff.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scaiff.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scaiff.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scaiff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: