Tools & Wizards About Us
scannerlicker.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

scannerlicker.net

Scannerlicker Type Foundry

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

820 ms

scannerlicker.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to scannerlicker.net homepage info - get ready to check Scannerlicker best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about scannerlicker.net

Retail, custom and free fonts.

Visit scannerlicker.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Scannerlicker.net page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scannerlicker.net performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.234

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scannerlicker.net

192 ms

fonts.scannerlicker.net

176 ms

fonts.scannerlicker.net

474 ms

reset.css

65 ms

wbf.css

310 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Scannerlicker.net, 75% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.scannerlicker.net and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (474 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.scannerlicker.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

807.1 kB

After Optimization

647.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scannerlicker.net main page is 807.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 740.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 10.9 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 148.3 kB

  • Original 740.2 kB
  • After minification 592.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scannerlicker needs image optimization as it can save up to 148.3 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 77 B

  • Original 51.7 kB
  • After minification 51.7 kB
  • After compression 51.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scannerlicker.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 52% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (37%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scannerlicker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

scannerlicker.net

scannerlicker.net

192 ms

fonts.scannerlicker.net

fonts.scannerlicker.net

176 ms

fonts.scannerlicker.net

fonts.scannerlicker.net

474 ms

reset.css

reset.css

65 ms

wbf.css

wbf.css

310 ms

accents.php

accents.php

274 ms

style.css

style.css

181 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

18 ms

ui.js

ui.js

185 ms

google.js

google.js

189 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

exetegue-home-featured.png

exetegue-home-featured.png

254 ms

home-featured.png

home-featured.png

251 ms

catorze27-s1-featured.png

catorze27-s1-featured.png

191 ms

optician-sans-featured.png

optician-sans-featured.png

194 ms

electrica-featured.png

electrica-featured.png

364 ms

grafista-featured.png

grafista-featured.png

368 ms

fester-featured.png

fester-featured.png

312 ms

spacemace-minecraft-featured.png

spacemace-minecraft-featured.png

314 ms

Urro.woff

Urro.woff

310 ms

Sebenta-Regular.woff

Sebenta-Regular.woff

307 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

js

js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

scannerlicker.net accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

scannerlicker.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

scannerlicker.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scannerlicker.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Scannerlicker.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scannerlicker.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scannerlicker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: