Tools & Wizards About Us
scanningtech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

scanningtech.com

Gamma Scans, Neutron Backscatter, FMD & Pipe Scanning

Page Load Speed

27.6 sec in total

First Response

8.7 sec

Resources Loaded

18.7 sec

Page Rendered

170 ms

scanningtech.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to scanningtech.com homepage info - get ready to check Scanning Tech best content for Nigeria right away, or after learning these important things about scanningtech.com

ScanTech provides Gamma Scans, FMD, neutron backscatter and pipe scans in refineries, chemical plants and offshore to customers worldwide.

Visit scanningtech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scanningtech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8.7 sec and then it took 18.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scanningtech.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,980 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.154

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.1 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scanningtech.com

8688 ms

styles.css

77 ms

comment-form.min.css

87 ms

privacy.min.css

88 ms

faqs.min.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Scanningtech.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Scanningtech.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (60%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

775.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scanningtech.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 170.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 99.2 kB
  • After minification 94.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scanning Tech images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

  • Original 544.7 kB
  • After minification 532.5 kB
  • After compression 482.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 591 B

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 28.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scanningtech.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (85%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scanning Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 65 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

scanningtech.com

scanningtech.com

8688 ms

styles.css

styles.css

77 ms

comment-form.min.css

comment-form.min.css

87 ms

privacy.min.css

privacy.min.css

88 ms

faqs.min.css

faqs.min.css

90 ms

portfolio.min.css

portfolio.min.css

88 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

106 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

146 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

126 ms

counter.js

counter.js

53 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

82 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

77 ms

auto_image_alt.js

auto_image_alt.js

95 ms

index.js

index.js

238 ms

index.js

index.js

238 ms

api.js

api.js

59 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

239 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

239 ms

index.js

index.js

255 ms

awb-tabs-widget.js

awb-tabs-widget.js

265 ms

awb-vertical-menu-widget.js

awb-vertical-menu-widget.js

266 ms

cssua.js

cssua.js

266 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

266 ms

fusion.js

fusion.js

334 ms

bootstrap.transition.js

bootstrap.transition.js

334 ms

bootstrap.tooltip.js

bootstrap.tooltip.js

334 ms

jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js

jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js

333 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

336 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

345 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

391 ms

jquery.ilightbox.js

jquery.ilightbox.js

390 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

343 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

347 ms

jquery.fade.js

jquery.fade.js

397 ms

fusion-equal-heights.js

fusion-equal-heights.js

397 ms

fusion-parallax.js

fusion-parallax.js

398 ms

count.js

count.js

394 ms

fusion-video-general.js

fusion-video-general.js

396 ms

fusion-video-bg.js

fusion-video-bg.js

375 ms

fusion-lightbox.js

fusion-lightbox.js

372 ms

fusion-tooltip.js

fusion-tooltip.js

368 ms

fusion-sharing-box.js

fusion-sharing-box.js

369 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.js

jquery.sticky-kit.js

368 ms

avada-general-footer.js

avada-general-footer.js

382 ms

avada-quantity.js

avada-quantity.js

367 ms

avada-crossfade-images.js

avada-crossfade-images.js

357 ms

avada-select.js

avada-select.js

354 ms

avada-contact-form-7.js

avada-contact-form-7.js

354 ms

jquery.elasticslider.js

jquery.elasticslider.js

360 ms

ga.js

ga.js

195 ms

t.php

t.php

280 ms

embed

embed

208 ms

avada-live-search.js

avada-live-search.js

223 ms

fusion-alert.js

fusion-alert.js

224 ms

awb-off-canvas.js

awb-off-canvas.js

229 ms

fusion-flexslider.js

fusion-flexslider.js

227 ms

fusion-animations.js

fusion-animations.js

243 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

94 ms

fusion-column-legacy.js

fusion-column-legacy.js

223 ms

fusion-button.js

fusion-button.js

223 ms

fusion-container.js

fusion-container.js

225 ms

avada-elastic-slider.js

avada-elastic-slider.js

183 ms

avada-drop-down.js

avada-drop-down.js

202 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

20 ms

avada-header.js

avada-header.js

182 ms

avada-menu.js

avada-menu.js

188 ms

bootstrap.scrollspy.js

bootstrap.scrollspy.js

193 ms

avada-scrollspy.js

avada-scrollspy.js

190 ms

fusion-responsive-typography.js

fusion-responsive-typography.js

206 ms

fusion-scroll-to-anchor.js

fusion-scroll-to-anchor.js

201 ms

fusion-general-global.js

fusion-general-global.js

208 ms

fusion-video.js

fusion-video.js

209 ms

fusion-column.js

fusion-column.js

159 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

238 ms

ScanTech_Logo.png

ScanTech_Logo.png

234 ms

ScanTech_Logo_small.png

ScanTech_Logo_small.png

235 ms

cropped_Towers-300x266.jpg

cropped_Towers-300x266.jpg

238 ms

Horizontal_vessels1.jpg

Horizontal_vessels1.jpg

232 ms

Pipeline.jpg

Pipeline.jpg

231 ms

Flooded.jpg

Flooded.jpg

230 ms

earth-globe-psd-20130314-300x288.jpg

earth-globe-psd-20130314-300x288.jpg

229 ms

js

js

32 ms

search.js

search.js

5 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

ctin.php

ctin.php

76 ms

Accessibility Review

scanningtech.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

scanningtech.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

scanningtech.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scanningtech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scanningtech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scanningtech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scanning Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: