Tools & Wizards About Us
scarshelper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

scarshelper.com

Scar treatment removal and correction, photos before and after Scar treatment, removal and correction, photos before and after

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

776 ms

scarshelper.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to scarshelper.com homepage info - get ready to check Scar Shelper best content right away, or after learning these important things about scarshelper.com

Scar treatment, removal and correction, photos before and after, description of all options, their advantages and disadvantages

Visit scarshelper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scarshelper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scarshelper.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1311 ms

style.min.css

206 ms

styles.css

210 ms

settings.css

210 ms

be.css

520 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Scarshelper.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Scarshelper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 429.0 kB (12%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scarshelper.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 155.6 kB

  • Original 187.9 kB
  • After minification 185.8 kB
  • After compression 32.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 178.5 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scar Shelper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 194.3 kB
  • After minification 194.1 kB
  • After compression 162.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 63.1 kB

  • Original 224.1 kB
  • After minification 224.1 kB
  • After compression 161.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scarshelper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (42%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scar Shelper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

1311 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

206 ms

styles.css

styles.css

210 ms

settings.css

settings.css

210 ms

be.css

be.css

520 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

212 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

312 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

310 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

412 ms

css

css

32 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

422 ms

language-cookie.js

language-cookie.js

213 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

321 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

317 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

454 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

416 ms

js

js

63 ms

css

css

18 ms

style.css

style.css

744 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

468 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

468 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

530 ms

debouncedresize.min.js

debouncedresize.min.js

520 ms

magnificpopup.min.js

magnificpopup.min.js

531 ms

menu.js

menu.js

530 ms

visible.min.js

visible.min.js

532 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

620 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

626 ms

enllax.min.js

enllax.min.js

625 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

629 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

634 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

723 ms

UK+(United+Kingdom).svg

UK+(United+Kingdom).svg

253 ms

RU+(russia).svg

RU+(russia).svg

254 ms

DE+(germany).svg

DE+(germany).svg

256 ms

SE+(Sweden).svg

SE+(Sweden).svg

283 ms

logo.png

logo.png

526 ms

5_slider.jpg

5_slider.jpg

555 ms

4_slider-1.jpg

4_slider-1.jpg

566 ms

2_slider-1.jpg

2_slider-1.jpg

565 ms

1_slider.jpg

1_slider.jpg

568 ms

3_slider-1.jpg

3_slider-1.jpg

572 ms

Qw3eZQdSHj_jK2e-8uFMEeI.ttf

Qw3eZQdSHj_jK2e-8uFMEeI.ttf

13 ms

Qw3eZQdSHj_jK2e-8uFMEeI.ttf

Qw3eZQdSHj_jK2e-8uFMEeI.ttf

25 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

13 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

750 ms

img.6_1a.jpg

img.6_1a.jpg

732 ms

img.6_2a-1.jpg

img.6_2a-1.jpg

642 ms

img.6_3a.jpg

img.6_3a.jpg

744 ms

img.6_4a.jpg

img.6_4a.jpg

744 ms

Atlas-engl.jpg

Atlas-engl.jpg

647 ms

photo-2.jpg

photo-2.jpg

747 ms

1_1-1.jpg

1_1-1.jpg

757 ms

Removing-ear-keloids.jpg

Removing-ear-keloids.jpg

837 ms

Removing-fresh-stretch-marks.jpg

Removing-fresh-stretch-marks.jpg

847 ms

Removal-of-old-post-burn-scars.jpg

Removal-of-old-post-burn-scars.jpg

848 ms

Hypertrophic-scar-before-and-after-treatment.jpg

Hypertrophic-scar-before-and-after-treatment.jpg

850 ms

Improving-of-atrophic-acne-scars.jpg

Improving-of-atrophic-acne-scars.jpg

955 ms

correction-atropic-acne-scars-1.jpg

correction-atropic-acne-scars-1.jpg

856 ms

Removal-of-fresh-atrophic-scar-on-the-nose.jpg

Removal-of-fresh-atrophic-scar-on-the-nose.jpg

920 ms

treatment-fresh-burn-keloids.jpg

treatment-fresh-burn-keloids.jpg

930 ms

Treatment-of-keloid-scars-on-the-chest.jpg

Treatment-of-keloid-scars-on-the-chest.jpg

931 ms

Treatment-of-hypertrophic-scar-after-c-section.jpg

Treatment-of-hypertrophic-scar-after-c-section.jpg

931 ms

Treatment-of-earlobe-keloid.jpg

Treatment-of-earlobe-keloid.jpg

918 ms

Reduction-of-old-stretch-marks.jpg

Reduction-of-old-stretch-marks.jpg

933 ms

Treatment-of-post-burn-keloid-scars.jpg

Treatment-of-post-burn-keloid-scars.jpg

940 ms

Atrophic-scar-treatment-with-pulsed-dye-laser.jpg

Atrophic-scar-treatment-with-pulsed-dye-laser.jpg

940 ms

Removal-of-a-fresh-postoperative-scar.jpg

Removal-of-a-fresh-postoperative-scar.jpg

938 ms

Treatment-of-fresh-posttraumatic-scars.jpg

Treatment-of-fresh-posttraumatic-scars.jpg

932 ms

Treatment-of-the-hypertrophic-scar-on-the-nose.jpg

Treatment-of-the-hypertrophic-scar-on-the-nose.jpg

849 ms

correction-scar-after-injury.jpg

correction-scar-after-injury.jpg

928 ms

removal-chest-keloid.jpg

removal-chest-keloid.jpg

938 ms

Accessibility Review

scarshelper.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

scarshelper.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

scarshelper.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scarshelper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scarshelper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scarshelper.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scar Shelper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: