1.5 sec in total
42 ms
1.1 sec
300 ms
Welcome to scharfautomation.com homepage info - get ready to check Scharf Automation best content right away, or after learning these important things about scharfautomation.com
Visit scharfautomation.comWe analyzed Scharfautomation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
scharfautomation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value710 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
42 ms
62 ms
23 ms
40 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Scharfautomation.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (475 ms) belongs to the original domain Scharfautomation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 115.0 kB (19%)
608.7 kB
493.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Scharfautomation.com main page is 608.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 242.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scharf Automation needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scharfautomation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (75%)
57
14
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scharf Automation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scharfautomation.com
42 ms
js
62 ms
aqpb-view.css
23 ms
css
40 ms
css
51 ms
style.min.css
122 ms
styles.css
31 ms
zilla-likes.css
128 ms
bootstrap.css
205 ms
animate.css
34 ms
fontello.css
41 ms
style.css
46 ms
responsive.css
51 ms
blue.css
58 ms
switcher.css
76 ms
colorpicker.css
78 ms
jquery.min.js
81 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
91 ms
zilla-likes.js
97 ms
js
76 ms
modernizrr.js
113 ms
color-picker.min.js
111 ms
switcher.js
126 ms
font-awesome.min.css
37 ms
content-shortcodes.css
129 ms
email-decode.min.js
126 ms
aqpb-view.js
384 ms
comment-reply.min.js
132 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
133 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
384 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
140 ms
index.js
147 ms
jquery.migrate.js
384 ms
bootstrap.js
151 ms
jquery.appear.js
163 ms
jquery.parallax.js
169 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
175 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
177 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
186 ms
count-to.js
188 ms
jquery.textillate.js
182 ms
jquery.lettering.js
355 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
351 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
397 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
338 ms
script.js
335 ms
scharf.gif
162 ms
browser-section.jpg
111 ms
Instruments3.png
475 ms
karolina_mor1_0043.jpg
161 ms
scharfautomation.com
112 ms
wockhardt.png
109 ms
hindustan-unilever.png
113 ms
Cipla1.png
114 ms
Barc.png
158 ms
iit-madras.png
114 ms
Reliance.png
114 ms
map.png
116 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
154 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
154 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
182 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
190 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
191 ms
fontello.woff
459 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexg.woff
190 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
54 ms
scharfautomation.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
scharfautomation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
scharfautomation.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scharfautomation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scharfautomation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scharfautomation.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scharf Automation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: