5 sec in total
1.5 sec
2.7 sec
784 ms
Click here to check amazing Schemata Body content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about schematabody.com
Dublin's top sports massage therapist, we focus on restoring & strengthening our clients' Function, Mobility, and Strength & Resilience with bodywork, massage and kinesiology.
Visit schematabody.comWe analyzed Schematabody.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
schematabody.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.163
72/100
15%
Value6.9 s
53/100
10%
1470 ms
38 ms
44 ms
65 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Schematabody.com, 59% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Schematabody.com.
Page size can be reduced by 234.2 kB (7%)
3.6 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Schematabody.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 190.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 190.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Schemata Body images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 162 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 63 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schematabody.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (21%)
19
15
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schemata Body. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
schematabody.com
1470 ms
js
38 ms
et-divi-dynamic-17-late.css
44 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
88 ms
scripts.min.js
156 ms
common.js
92 ms
schemata-bodyworks-logo-horizontal.png
86 ms
schemata-bodyworks-dublin-sports-massage-3.jpeg
367 ms
schemata-bodyworks-dublin-sports-massage-scaled.jpeg
347 ms
kettlebell-2052765_1920.jpg
352 ms
swimmers-79592_1920.jpg
353 ms
pexels-andrea-piacquadio-863926.jpg
346 ms
pexels-victor-freitas-2261482.jpg
348 ms
pexels-andrea-piacquadio-3771805.jpg
348 ms
pexels-vinicius-wiesehofer-1090387.jpg
348 ms
personal-trainer-17.jpg
350 ms
pexels-andrea-piacquadio-789822.jpg
349 ms
aaaa-300x225.png
353 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
77 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
77 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
78 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
80 ms
modules.woff
40 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exg.woff
79 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
80 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exg.woff
83 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
81 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exg.woff
82 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
81 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exg.woff
82 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
85 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exg.woff
84 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
84 ms
font
163 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDr0fJQ.ttf
84 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDr0fJg.woff
84 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDr0fJQ.ttf
87 ms
font
163 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDr0fJQ.ttf
84 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDr0fJg.woff
85 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDr0fJQ.ttf
103 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDr0fJg.woff
85 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDr0fJQ.ttf
86 ms
style.min.css
53 ms
schematabody.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
schematabody.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
schematabody.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schematabody.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schematabody.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
schematabody.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Schemata Body. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: