Tools & Wizards About Us
schengen-travel.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

schengen-travel.ru

Оформим Финскую визу до 5 лет

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

499 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

645 ms

schengen-travel.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit schengen-travel.ru now to see the best up-to-date Schengen Travel content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about schengen-travel.ru

без прописки в Санкт-Петербурге!

Visit schengen-travel.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Schengen-travel.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 499 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

schengen-travel.ru performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.144

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

schengen-travel.ru

499 ms

xn----dtbbhbbb2clc8ax5e.xn--p1ai

534 ms

xn----dtbbhbbb2clc8ax5e.xn--p1ai

596 ms

style3.css

133 ms

main.min.css

272 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Schengen-travel.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Schengen-travel.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source .

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Schengen-travel.ru main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 71.5 kB

  • Original 82.1 kB
  • After minification 62.8 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 977.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Schengen Travel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 770 B

  • Original 141.0 kB
  • After minification 141.0 kB
  • After compression 140.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 20.3 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schengen-travel.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

40

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schengen Travel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

schengen-travel.ru

schengen-travel.ru

499 ms

xn----dtbbhbbb2clc8ax5e.xn--p1ai

xn----dtbbhbbb2clc8ax5e.xn--p1ai

534 ms

xn----dtbbhbbb2clc8ax5e.xn--p1ai

xn----dtbbhbbb2clc8ax5e.xn--p1ai

596 ms

style3.css

style3.css

133 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

272 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

622 ms

script_new3.js

script_new3.js

390 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

30 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

41 ms

js

js

578 ms

shtamp1.svg

shtamp1.svg

399 ms

shtamp.svg

shtamp.svg

399 ms

our_partner.png

our_partner.png

529 ms

02.png

02.png

522 ms

01.png

01.png

510 ms

06.png

06.png

532 ms

05.png

05.png

530 ms

07.png

07.png

746 ms

10.png

10.png

746 ms

12.png

12.png

747 ms

11.png

11.png

747 ms

16.png

16.png

747 ms

steps_box1_img.jpg

steps_box1_img.jpg

748 ms

fin.png

fin.png

768 ms

ital.png

ital.png

790 ms

lit.png

lit.png

791 ms

est.png

est.png

795 ms

ger.png

ger.png

796 ms

isp.png

isp.png

854 ms

kit.png

kit.png

875 ms

fr.png

fr.png

922 ms

oae.png

oae.png

921 ms

india.png

india.png

924 ms

britain.png

britain.png

929 ms

greece.png

greece.png

973 ms

section6_img_finland.png

section6_img_finland.png

1117 ms

step_arrow.png

step_arrow.png

1052 ms

14.png

14.png

1055 ms

foreign_passport.png

foreign_passport.png

1056 ms

pin_on_map.svg

pin_on_map.svg

1061 ms

vk.png

vk.png

1090 ms

fb.png

fb.png

1182 ms

tw.png

tw.png

1066 ms

in.png

in.png

805 ms

RobotoLight.woff

RobotoLight.woff

946 ms

RobotoRegular.woff

RobotoRegular.woff

811 ms

RobotoBold.woff

RobotoBold.woff

843 ms

RobotoBlack.woff

RobotoBlack.woff

813 ms

HelveticaBold.woff

HelveticaBold.woff

802 ms

HelveticaBlack.woff

HelveticaBlack.woff

959 ms

HelveticaRegular.woff

HelveticaRegular.woff

803 ms

HelveticaLight.woff

HelveticaLight.woff

835 ms

tag.js

tag.js

805 ms

bg_head_finland.jpg

bg_head_finland.jpg

843 ms

label_usluga.png

label_usluga.png

741 ms

checkbox-checked.png

checkbox-checked.png

740 ms

bg_section2_finland.jpg

bg_section2_finland.jpg

982 ms

bg_section7.jpg

bg_section7.jpg

757 ms

bg_section_foreign_passport.jpg

bg_section_foreign_passport.jpg

816 ms

map.png

map.png

1344 ms

icon__metro-1.svg

icon__metro-1.svg

826 ms

metro.png

metro.png

821 ms

slick-arrow-l.svg

slick-arrow-l.svg

891 ms

slick-arrow-r.svg

slick-arrow-r.svg

924 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

558 ms

Accessibility Review

schengen-travel.ru accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

schengen-travel.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

schengen-travel.ru SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schengen-travel.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schengen-travel.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

schengen-travel.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Schengen Travel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: