3.5 sec in total
220 ms
3.2 sec
84 ms
Visit schiefer.co now to see the best up-to-date Schiefer content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about schiefer.co
Visit schiefer.coWe analyzed Schiefer.co page load time and found that the first response time was 220 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
schiefer.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value470 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.09
92/100
15%
Value26.2 s
0/100
10%
220 ms
592 ms
710 ms
423 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Schiefer.co, 8% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Schieferco.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Schiefer.co.
Page size can be reduced by 104.8 kB (40%)
264.1 kB
159.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Schiefer.co main page is 264.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 100.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Schiefer needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (11%)
45
40
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schiefer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
schiefer.co
220 ms
schiefer.co
592 ms
web.assets_frontend.min.css
710 ms
web.assets_frontend_minimal.min.js
423 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
16 ms
17.jpg
510 ms
Schiefer%20%26%20Co
158 ms
schiefer-logo-edelmetall.png
227 ms
partners-1-1.png
259 ms
Start-Der-kleine-Prinz-Schiefer-Co.-Edelmetall-Scheideanstalt-Hamburg.webp
1210 ms
Startseite-Schiefer-Co.-Privatkunden-_x-1-1.webp
584 ms
H43C0661.jpg.p.webp
500 ms
Schiefer-Co.-Schriftlogo-2021.webp
494 ms
2.webp
487 ms
ex-Chef_Schiefer.webp
501 ms
Netzladen-SCo-e1683810819309.webp
713 ms
Veranstaltung-SCo-e1683810779856.webp
727 ms
KMLS-Schiefer-Co-Zertifizierungssystem-300x259.webp
823 ms
chart_year_Gold.webp
735 ms
Ecosia.webp
750 ms
OXMOX.webp
883 ms
Scheideanstalt-des-Jahres-Schiefer-Co.-2020.webp
888 ms
fb_bw.png
862 ms
twitter_bw.png
884 ms
gplus_bw.png
932 ms
bitcoin_bw.png
976 ms
youtube_bw.png
1005 ms
pinterest_bw.png
1005 ms
instagram.png
1013 ms
50x50
1061 ms
icon.png
1085 ms
offline_app.png
1150 ms
t_hamburg-logo-desktop.webp
1169 ms
t_theodor-1.webp
1181 ms
t_berckwerk.webp
1235 ms
kulturisten-1.webp
1239 ms
t_223034552_8163162007186024001.webp
1278 ms
t_logo_de_180_0-288-256.webp
1316 ms
Logo_AdK.webp
1322 ms
brazil.webp
1368 ms
logo_footer.png
602 ms
partners.png
764 ms
260D8B_0_0.woff
1201 ms
260D8B_1_0.woff
1218 ms
odoo_ui_icons.woff
1227 ms
embed
286 ms
260D8B_2_0.woff
1206 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1274 ms
js
30 ms
search.js
3 ms
geometry.js
6 ms
main.js
10 ms
schiefer.co accessibility score
schiefer.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
schiefer.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schiefer.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schiefer.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
schiefer.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Schiefer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: