5.6 sec in total
537 ms
4.7 sec
339 ms
Click here to check amazing Schmuck content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about schmuck.de
mehr als 200 TOP Marken ➤ Damenschmuck ➤ Herrenschmuck ➤ Silberschmuck ➤ Goldschmuck ➤ Marken Armbanduhren ➤ Trauringe
Visit schmuck.deWe analyzed Schmuck.de page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
schmuck.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value2,630 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
537 ms
1945 ms
311 ms
711 ms
320 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Schmuck.de, 17% (13 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Schmuck.de.
Page size can be reduced by 508.1 kB (31%)
1.6 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Schmuck.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 981.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Schmuck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 368.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 368.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schmuck.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (47%)
73
39
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schmuck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
schmuck.de
537 ms
www.schmuck.de
1945 ms
efdb4208ab1a65629d56ac914c319cd3.css
311 ms
opti-prototype-prototype.js
711 ms
opti-lib-ccard.js
320 ms
opti-prototype-validation.js
417 ms
opti-scriptaculous-effects.js
419 ms
opti-scriptaculous-controls.js
428 ms
opti-varien-js.js
416 ms
opti-varien-form.js
415 ms
opti-mage-translate.js
520 ms
opti-mage-cookies.js
520 ms
opti-varien-product.js
521 ms
opti-varien-configurable.js
524 ms
config.js
537 ms
amAjax.js
727 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
629 ms
respond.min.js
627 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.js
630 ms
jquery.iosslider.min.js
646 ms
stickyMojo.js
740 ms
client.js
741 ms
jquery.confirm.js
742 ms
bundle.js
758 ms
1.js
316 ms
schmuck.jpg
109 ms
Header_Ringe.jpg
524 ms
Header_Ohrringe.jpg
414 ms
Header_Anhaenger.jpg
212 ms
Header_Herrenringe.jpg
318 ms
Header_Uhren.jpg
339 ms
1155AW_2.jpg
233 ms
9687YK_2.jpg
321 ms
8724HE_3.jpg
341 ms
8432BM_3.jpg
427 ms
7465CD_3.jpg
425 ms
5804SG_3.jpg
449 ms
3571QT_3.jpg
447 ms
3508VJ_3.jpg
521 ms
3414OB_2.jpg
534 ms
3183XV_3.jpg
536 ms
3162DT_3.jpg
561 ms
9922TW_2.jpg
564 ms
partner.jpg
628 ms
ga.js
73 ms
ramp1.png
622 ms
shoppingbag.png
623 ms
josefinsansstd-light-webfont.svg
629 ms
white50.png
650 ms
bg_black_40.png
648 ms
likebox.php
167 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
39 ms
kTub4bakEmM.css
35 ms
FAHeNGXgPup.js
43 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
42 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
66 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
40 ms
10689919_820318628016619_412999873401486844_n.png
49 ms
1382787_612105745504576_264969724_n.png
14 ms
12410558_922550077852215_9100063267240508958_n.jpg
12 ms
12400950_1194557030573581_6942660883849871689_n.jpg
13 ms
12011215_102559663440369_8410372493268567793_n.jpg
76 ms
399521_2091581629575_26175559_n.jpg
10 ms
1382798_1703292966583947_6137807713294236447_n.jpg
39 ms
12279101_10208289360340444_4255251163472147454_n.jpg
14 ms
11870708_1444271295902863_8324518597938660990_n.jpg
46 ms
207922_106937799459338_998360590_n.jpg
15 ms
1379841_10150004552801901_469209496895221757_n.jpg
14 ms
12832502_1031600736912372_169440356294143565_n.jpg
17 ms
12651287_952052414849523_913193070630384635_n.jpg
15 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
7 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
6 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
2 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
3 ms
josefinsansstd-light-webfont.woff
122 ms
schmuck.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
schmuck.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
schmuck.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schmuck.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schmuck.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
schmuck.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Schmuck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: