5.8 sec in total
1 sec
4.6 sec
205 ms
Visit schnapp.de now to see the best up-to-date Schnapp content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about schnapp.de
Bereits ab 0,00 € inserieren auf schnapp.de - der Kleinanzeigenmarkt für die Region Freiburg und Südbaden. alles einfach – einfach alles.
Visit schnapp.deWe analyzed Schnapp.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
schnapp.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
8/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value8,550 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value22.4 s
1/100
10%
1047 ms
366 ms
463 ms
367 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Schnapp.de, 23% (23 requests) were made to Img.schnapp.de and 15% (15 requests) were made to Dmp.theadex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Schnapp.de.
Page size can be reduced by 652.7 kB (48%)
1.3 MB
696.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Schnapp.de main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 694.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Schnapp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 450.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schnapp.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (77%)
92
21
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schnapp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
schnapp.de
1047 ms
core.css
366 ms
jquery-1.6.4.min.js
463 ms
jquery.form.js
367 ms
jquery.tools-1.2.5.min.js
367 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.css
367 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.min.js
592 ms
filtermanager.js
216 ms
expose.js
215 ms
iam.js
402 ms
load
326 ms
connect.js
276 ms
reset.css
199 ms
typography.css
201 ms
layout.css
203 ms
159324668-p-114_85.jpg
372 ms
schnapp_logo.png
102 ms
shadow_detailansicht.png
199 ms
shadow_thumbs.png
200 ms
159425689-p-114_85.jpg
275 ms
159432133-p-114_85.jpg
377 ms
159431406-p-114_85.jpg
378 ms
qs.ioam.de
292 ms
tx.io
193 ms
tx.io
97 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
body_bg_wall.png
204 ms
winter_header.png
603 ms
layout.png
402 ms
iconsprite.png
300 ms
expertensuche_bg.png
217 ms
content_wall_bg_top.png
203 ms
content_wall_bg.png
379 ms
box_bg.png
402 ms
loader.gif
407 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
26 ms
footer_bg_wall.png
467 ms
spcjs.php
219 ms
collect
62 ms
collect
54 ms
spc.php
265 ms
fl.js
203 ms
lg.php
212 ms
lg.php
213 ms
lg.php
218 ms
lg.php
220 ms
coregpt.js
240 ms
omsv_container_151.js
229 ms
gpt.js
4 ms
rc
221 ms
26865,26867,26869,26871
144 ms
rta.js
18 ms
default.js
165 ms
ci
212 ms
adex.js
358 ms
p.min.js
9 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
10 ms
data
340 ms
container.html
25 ms
ads
452 ms
t.js
124 ms
2.gif
173 ms
adex.js
193 ms
adrtxtag.min.js
165 ms
analytic.js
130 ms
149 ms
1.gif
242 ms
imgad
24 ms
mtrcs_278674.js
290 ms
mtrcs_278674.js
283 ms
osd.js
10 ms
deliver2
288 ms
pixel
15 ms
cm.gif
90 ms
analytic.js
89 ms
120 ms
1.gif
191 ms
2.gif
158 ms
2.gif
155 ms
pixel
13 ms
cm.gif
129 ms
mtrcs_278674.js
41 ms
2.gif
129 ms
mtrcs_278674.js
99 ms
11125.php
280 ms
dialog-warning.gif
106 ms
imgad
25 ms
imgad
28 ms
revoke
299 ms
submit
294 ms
2.gif
91 ms
activeview
12 ms
submit
179 ms
submit
189 ms
12741-162243-40720-4
8 ms
300x250_first-day-at-school-portrait-schoolyears_DE_0368_a.gif
23 ms
chartbeat.js
6 ms
schnapp.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
schnapp.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
schnapp.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schnapp.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schnapp.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
schnapp.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Schnapp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: