Tools & Wizards About Us
schnepp.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

schnepp.net

Schnepp Senior Care & Rehab Center - A NexCare Managed Community

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

413 ms

schnepp.net screenshot

About Website

Visit schnepp.net now to see the best up-to-date Schnepp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about schnepp.net

Short-Term Rehabilitation and Long-Term Care Services; Enjoy an EPIC Stay in St. Louis, Michigan! Call us at 989-681-5721 for info or to schedule a tour!

Visit schnepp.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Schnepp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

schnepp.net performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,900 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.011

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

schnepp.net

43 ms

2125 ms

slick.css

67 ms

jquery.min.js

35 ms

storelocator.css

1182 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Schnepp.net, 80% (43 requests) were made to Nexcarehealth.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Nexcarehealth.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 804.6 kB (33%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Schnepp.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 77.8 kB

  • Original 92.7 kB
  • After minification 87.3 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 84.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Schnepp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 381.3 kB

  • Original 830.7 kB
  • After minification 719.9 kB
  • After compression 449.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 381.3 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 260.7 kB

  • Original 295.1 kB
  • After minification 239.4 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schnepp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 260.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (59%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schnepp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

schnepp.net

schnepp.net

43 ms

2125 ms

slick.css

slick.css

67 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

storelocator.css

storelocator.css

1182 ms

handlebars.js

handlebars.js

706 ms

js

js

94 ms

jquery.storelocator.js

jquery.storelocator.js

703 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

699 ms

style.css

style.css

701 ms

job-styles.css

job-styles.css

699 ms

social-icon-styles.css

social-icon-styles.css

791 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

797 ms

styles.css

styles.css

786 ms

css3-mediaqueries.js

css3-mediaqueries.js

797 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

795 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

822 ms

job-scripts.js

job-scripts.js

825 ms

api.js

api.js

47 ms

119662.js

119662.js

36 ms

js

js

72 ms

js

js

110 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

832 ms

slickinitialize.js

slickinitialize.js

816 ms

index.js

index.js

824 ms

index.js

index.js

836 ms

api.js

api.js

45 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

835 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

836 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

845 ms

index.js

index.js

851 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

851 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

87 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

86 ms

Schnepp_Logo-white.png

Schnepp_Logo-white.png

80 ms

silver-2019.png

silver-2019.png

86 ms

gptw-apr-22.png

gptw-apr-22.png

86 ms

header-swoop.png

header-swoop.png

72 ms

schnepp1-m.jpg

schnepp1-m.jpg

79 ms

schnepp1-d.jpg

schnepp1-d.jpg

79 ms

jobicon-therapy-2.png

jobicon-therapy-2.png

78 ms

icon-health-wellbeing-services.png

icon-health-wellbeing-services.png

153 ms

rehab1-m.jpg

rehab1-m.jpg

154 ms

swoop-bkg-from-bottom.png

swoop-bkg-from-bottom.png

153 ms

swoop-bkg.png

swoop-bkg.png

154 ms

logo-color.png

logo-color.png

152 ms

soc-fb.png

soc-fb.png

153 ms

soc-tw.png

soc-tw.png

153 ms

soc-ig.png

soc-ig.png

166 ms

soc-li.png

soc-li.png

154 ms

epic.jpg

epic.jpg

168 ms

swoop-bkg-cover.png

swoop-bkg-cover.png

150 ms

swoop-bkg-cover-reversed-locations.png

swoop-bkg-cover-reversed-locations.png

151 ms

mtl3cwg.js

mtl3cwg.js

112 ms

Accessibility Review

schnepp.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

schnepp.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

schnepp.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schnepp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schnepp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

schnepp.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Schnepp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: